Literature DB >> 575783

Glomerular filtration during furosemide diuresis in the dog.

T J Burke, K L Duchin.   

Abstract

Simultaneous clearance and micropuncture experiments were performed in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs to determine the effect of furosemide (F; 5 mg/kg) on some of the determinants of GFR during replacement of urine losses. Glomerular capillary pressure (PG) was estimated from stop flow pressure (SFP) plus systemic colloid osmotic pressure (pi alpha). Because renal vasodilation during F administration occurs more often when blood pressure is elevated, two groups of dogs were studied. At endogenous renal perfusion pressure (RPP) of 130 mm Hg, one group responded to F with a 28% increase in renal blood flow (RBF). PG rose (a rise of 18 mm Hg) in proportion to the rise in proximal tubule pressure (PT) (a rise of 20 mm Hg). Thus, the difference in pressures (PG - PT) was unchanged, as was GFR. The second group had RPP lowered by renal artery constriction to a point near the lower limit of autoregulation (104 mm Hg). These dogs responded to F with no increase in RBF; PG was lower and remained constant during F, PT, however, increased (a rise of 10 mm Hg). The difference in pressures (delta P) decreased by 30%, and GFR decreased by 40%. Single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) also decreased, and estimated Kf, the ultrafiltration coefficient, actually rose slightly. The major reason for the fall in GFR and SNGFR was due to a decrease in delta P rather than a decrease in Kf. The decrease in delta P can be attributed to failure of the renal vasculature to dilate because PG and RBF remained constant. It is likely that these events will be observed less often at hypertensive BP than at normal BP where renal vascular resistence is already close to a minimum value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 575783     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1979.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  8 in total

Review 1.  Renal autoregulation in health and disease.

Authors:  Mattias Carlström; Christopher S Wilcox; William J Arendshorst
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  The effect of reducing proximal tubular fluid delivery on the rate of filtration of single nephrons.

Authors:  G Romano; G Favret; E Federico; E Bartoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Furosemide (frusemide). A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic review (Part II).

Authors:  L L Ponto; R D Schoenwald
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Diuretics. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use (Part I).

Authors:  A Lant
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A comparison of the pharmacokinetics and diuretic effects of two loop diuretics, torasemide and furosemide, in normal volunteers.

Authors:  L Dodion; Y Ambroes; N Lameire
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Shear stress blunts tubuloglomerular feedback partially mediated by primary cilia and nitric oxide at the macula densa.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Chunyu Shen; Haifeng Liu; Shaohui Wang; Xinshan Chen; Richard J Roman; Luis A Juncos; Yan Lu; Jin Wei; Jie Zhang; Kay-Pong Yip; Ruisheng Liu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Stereoselective renal effects of the loop diuretic ozolinone in the anesthetized dog.

Authors:  M Barthelmebs; D Stephan; J P Krieger; M Grima; J L Imbs
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Renal responses to diuretics in the turtle.

Authors:  G A Stephens; F M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.200

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.