Laboratory comparison of urethral profilometry techniques.

A comparison of urethral pressure profiles performed with the air infusion, water infusion, membrane catheter, and transducer tip catheter techniques was made in a canine model. The gas and water infusion methods gave statistically identical results if the gas studies were performed at flow rates of 100 ml./min. and pull rates of 5 cm./min. The transducer tip catheter and the gas and water infusion techniques gave accurate recordings of peak urethral pressure but were incapable of detecting multiple areas of urethral compression. The transducer tip catheter measurements often were difficult to interpret because of rotation and flexion artifact. The membrane catheter was capable of recording multiple areas of urethral compression but gave spuriously high recordings of peak urethral pressure. We conclude that none of the methods tested will give accurate recordings of urethral pressure in all clinical situations.