Literature DB >> 5688862

The present status of spinal (subarachnoid) and epidural (peridural) block: a comparison of the two technics.

D C Moore, L D Bridenbaugh, P A Bagdi, P O Bridenbaugh, H Stander.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1968        PMID： 5688862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN： 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  [The effect of central nervous modulation on the quality of epidural blockade.].

Authors:  H Ponhold
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  Adverse effects and drug interactions associated with local and regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  M Naguib; M M Magboul; A H Samarkandi; M Attia
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  A review of the complications of spinal anaesthesia with experiences in Canadian teaching hospitals from 1959 to 1969.

Authors:  A B Noble; J G Murray
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1971-01

Review 4.  Modern trends in spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  P C Lund; J C Cwik
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1968-03

5.  Plain bupivacaine 0.5%: a preliminary evaluation as a spinal anaesthetic agent.

Authors:  D W Ryan; A K Pridie; P F Copeland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Asystole during spinal anaesthesia after change from Trendelenburg to horizontal position.

Authors:  T Nishikawa; Y Anzai; A Namiki
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.063
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.