Literature DB >> 562887

A study of communication specificity between cells in culture.

M L Epstein, N B Gilula.   

Abstract

We have examined the specificity of communication between cells in culture by co-culturing cells derived from mammalian, avian, and arthropod organisms. Both mammalian and avian culture cells have similar gap junctional phenotypes, while the insect (arthropod) cell lines have a significantly different gap junctional structure. Electrophysiological and ultrastructural methods were used to examine ionic coupling and junctional interactions between homologous and heterologous cell types. In homologous cell systems, gap junctions and ionic coupling are present at a high incidence. Also, heterologous vertebrate cells in co-culture can communicate readily. By contrast, practically no coupling (0-8%) is detectable between heterologous insect cell lines (Homopteran or Lepidopteran) and vertebrate cells (mammalian myocardial or 3T3 cells). No gap junctions have been observed between arthropod and vertebrate cell types, even though the heterologous cells may be separated by less than 10 nm. In additional studies, a low incidence of coupling was found between heterologous insect cell lines derived from different arthropod orders. However, extensive coupling was detected between insect cell lines that are derived from the same order (Homoptera). These observations suggest that there is little or no apparent specificity for communication between vertebrate cells in culture that express the same gap junctional phenotype, while there is a definite communication specificity that exists between arthropod cells in culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 562887      PMCID: PMC2111582          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  19 in total

1.  Selective contact-dependent cell communication.

Authors:  I Fentiman; J Taylor-Papadimitriou; M Stoker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Metabolic coupling, ionic coupling and cell contacts.

Authors:  N B Gilula; O R Reeves; A Steinbach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The fine structure of membranes and intercellular communication in insects.

Authors:  P Satir; N B Gilula
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Gap junctions in normal and transformed fibroblasts in culture.

Authors:  P Pinto da Silva; N B Gilula
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Low-resistance junctions between cells in embryos and tissue culture.

Authors:  E J Furshpan; D D Potter
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Selective lysis of cells transformed by Rous Sarcoma virus.

Authors:  D B Rifkin; E Reich
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 7.  Membrane ultrastructure at mammalian intercellular junctions.

Authors:  N S McNutt; R S Weinstein
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  Synchronizatin of pulsation rates in isolated cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  R L DeHaan; R Hirakow
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  Established insect cell line from the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni.

Authors:  W F Hink
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Low resistance junctions in crayfish. I. Two arrays of globules in junctional membranes.

Authors:  C Peracchia
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  37 in total

1.  Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of 4 TMS junctional proteins of animals: connexins, innexins, claudins and occludins.

Authors:  V B Hua; A B Chang; J H Tchieu; N M Kumar; P A Nielsen; M H Saier
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 2.  Occluding junctions of invertebrate epithelia.

Authors:  Sima Jonusaite; Andrew Donini; Scott P Kelly
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Connexin and pannexin mediated cell-cell communication.

Authors:  Eliana Scemes; Sylvia O Suadicani; Gerhard Dahl; David C Spray
Journal:  Neuron Glia Biol       Date:  2007-08

4.  Integration of Plasticity Mechanisms within a Single Sensory Neuron of C. elegans Actuates a Memory.

Authors:  Josh D Hawk; Ana C Calvo; Ping Liu; Agustin Almoril-Porras; Ahmad Aljobeh; María Luisa Torruella-Suárez; Ivy Ren; Nathan Cook; Joel Greenwood; Linjiao Luo; Zhao-Wen Wang; Aravinthan D T Samuel; Daniel A Colón-Ramos
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Multiple connexin proteins in single intercellular channels: connexin compatibility and functional consequences.

Authors:  T W White; R Bruzzone
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Structural order in Pannexin 1 cytoplasmic domains.

Authors:  Gaelle Spagnol; Paul L Sorgen; David C Spray
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Formation of hybrid cell-cell channels.

Authors:  R Werner; E Levine; C Rabadan-Diehl; G Dahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Functional analysis of selective interactions among rodent connexins.

Authors:  T W White; D L Paul; D A Goodenough; R Bruzzone
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 9.  Connexins, pannexins, innexins: novel roles of "hemi-channels".

Authors:  Eliana Scemes; David C Spray; Paolo Meda
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  Established cell lines from different groups of vertebrates undergo metabolic cooperation with one another.

Authors:  M A Slater; D D Mosser; N C Bols
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1983-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.