Literature DB >> 553920

Microprocessor, self-recording and manual audiometry.

D A Harris.   

Abstract

AC HTLs were measured on 12 normal-hearing young adults by (a) standardized manual, (b) self-recording (Bekesy), and (c) microprocessor audiometry stimulating standard manual procedure, to determine how threshold measurements would be affected by the 3 methods of testing when utilized in industrial hearing conservation programs for compliance with federal agency recommendations. Self-recording audiometry resulted in mean thresholds lower than standard manual audiometry by from 1-9 db; microprocessor audiometry resulted in thresholds higher than standard manual audiometry by from 0.2-4.4 db except at 4 kc/s where the microprocessor mean threshold was 3.8 db lower. Thus microprocessor audiometry more closely approximated audiometry by standard manual procedure. All 3 methods required 7-8 min per S for a 7-frequency audiogram on both ears.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 553920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aud Res        ISSN: 0021-9177


  3 in total

1.  Comparing the Accuracy and Speed of Manual and Tracking Methods of Measuring Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Theresa J Kunnel; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Validity of automated audiometry for hearing examination in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Nyilo Purnami; Rian W Palandeng; Soedarsono -; Dhany Arifianto; In Seok Moon
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-12-14

3.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Automated Audiometry in Subjects with Normal Hearing or Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Åsa Skjonsberg; Catrine Heggen; Meisere Jamil; Per Muhr; Ulf Rosenhall
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.