Literature DB >> 542499

Some relationships between speech production and perception.

F Bell-Berti, L J Raphael, D B Pisoni, J R Sawusch.   

Abstract

EMG studies of the American English vowel pairs /i-I/ and /e-epsilon/ reveal two different production strategies: some speakers appear to differentiate the members of each pair primarily on the basis to tongue height; for others the basis of differentiation appears to be tongue tension. There was no obvious reflection of these differences in the speech wave-forms or formant patterns of the two groups. To determine if these differences in production might correspond to differences in perception, two vowel identification tests were given to the EMG subjects. Subjects were asked to label the members of a seven-step vowel continuum, /i/ through /I/. In one condition each item had an equal probability of occurrence. The other condition was an anchoring test; the first stimulus, /i/, was heard four times as often as any other stimulus. Compared with the equal-probability test labelling boundary, the boundary in the anchoring test was displaced toward the more frequently occurring stimulus. The magnitude of the shift of the labelling boundary was greater for subjects using a production strategy based on tongue height than for subjects using tongue tension to differentiate these vowels, suggesting that the stimuli represent adjacent categories in the speakers' phonetic space for the former, but not for the latter, group.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 542499      PMCID: PMC3902850          DOI: 10.1159/000259974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phonetica        ISSN: 0031-8388            Impact factor:   1.759


  6 in total

1.  Perceptuo-motor adaptation to speech: an analysis of bisyllabic utterances and a neural model.

Authors:  W E Cooper; R M Nager
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Control of pharyngeal cavity size for English voiced and voiceless stops.

Authors:  F Bell-Berti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Tongue musculature and the feature of tension in English vowels.

Authors:  L J Raphael; F Bell-Berti
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Feature processing in the perception and production of speech.

Authors:  W E Cooper; M R Lauritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  On the production of low tongue tip /s/: a case report.

Authors:  G J Borden; T Gay
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.288

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Categorization of ambiguous sentences as a function of a changing prosodic parameter: a dynamical approach.

Authors:  J Raczaszek; B Tuller; L P Shapiro; P Case; S Kelso
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1999-07

Review 2.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

3.  Articulatory events are imitated under rapid shadowing.

Authors:  Douglas N Honorof; Jeffrey Weihing; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-12-13

4.  Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; Louis Goldstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Computer simulations of coupled idiosyncrasies in speech perception and speech production with COSMO, a perceptuo-motor Bayesian model of speech communication.

Authors:  Marie-Lou Barnaud; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Pierre Bessière; Julien Diard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Linking Variation in Perception and Production in Sound Change: Evidence from Dutch Obstruent Devoicing.

Authors:  Anne-France Pinget; René Kager; Hans Van de Velde
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 1.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.