Literature DB >> 5413282

Properties of cholinoceptive neurones in the medial geniculate nucleus.

A K Tebecis.   

Abstract

1. Acetylcholine (ACh), other cholinomimetics, cholinesterase inhibitors and cholinergic antagonists were administered iontophoretically to medial geniculate (MG) neurones and their effects on chemically or neurally evoked responses recorded extracellularly.2. Acetylcholine had excitant actions on 45% of the neurones tested. Most of these were of a slow time course. Desensitization to the excitant effects was frequently observed.3. Acetylcholine excited 91% of neurones activated antidromically by stimulation of the auditory cortex, 71% of neurones activated synaptically from the auditory cortex, 74% of neurones activated from the inferior colliculus and 100% of geniculo-cortical relay neurones.4. Acetylcholine had depressant effects, which were generally of a rapid time course, on 29% of MG neurones. No desensitization to the depressant effects was observed.5. On 4% of neurones, ACh had both excitant and depressant effects. Such "dual" effects were manifested either as an initial excitation followed by a depression, or as a depression followed by an excitation.6. Eserine, neostigmine and edrophonium potentiated both excitant and depressant actions of ACh on many cells. Neostigmine and edrophonium occasionally antagonized the effects of ACh.7. Atropine, hyoscine, dihydro-beta-erythroidine, hexamethonium and (+)-tubocurarine antagonized both excitant and depressant effects of ACh. The muscarinic blocking agents were usually more effective than the nicotinic agents.8. Carbamylcholine, acetyl-beta-methylcholine, nicotine, butyrylcholine, arecoline and pilocarpine had excitant, depressant or no effects on MG neurones. Generally, carbamylcholine was more potent than acetyl-beta-methylcholine and ACh, which were more potent than nicotine. Butyrylcholine, arecoline and pilocarpine were even less potent, often having no effect.9. The cholinomimetics generally had similar effects to those of ACh on the same neurones, but sometimes were quite different. Carbamylcholine, acetyl-beta-methylcholine and nicotine antagonized the effects of ACh on some neurones.10. The results suggest that cholinoceptive receptors on MG neurones are not homogeneous. Although there are possibly some purely muscarinic and purely nicotinic receptors, the majority appear to be of intermediate muscarinic-nicotinic type. These mediate either excitation or inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1970        PMID: 5413282      PMCID: PMC1702632          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb10341.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  48 in total

Review 1.  ACTIONS OF DRUGS ON SINGLE NEURONES IN THE BRAIN-STEM.

Authors:  P B BRADLEY; J H WOLSTENCROFT
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  THE LOCATION OF MICROELECTRODE TIPS IN NERVOUS TISSUES.

Authors:  I MCCANCE; J W PHILLIS
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1965-02-15

3.  Pharmacologic studies of norepinephrine, acetylcholine and related compounds on neurons in Deiters' nucleus and the cerebellum.

Authors:  C Yamamoto
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Effects of gallamine and physostigmine on transmission through the cuneate nucleus.

Authors:  E S Boyd; D A Meritt; S Aroesty; M Celso
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1969-03

5.  Are 5-hydroxytryptamine and noradrenaline inhibitory transmitters in the medial geniculate nucleus?

Authors:  A K Tebecis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Influence of centrifugal pathways on unit activity in the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  S D Comis; I C Whitfield
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Micro-electrophoretic studies of neurones in the cat hippocampus.

Authors:  T J Biscoe; D W Straughan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Pharmacological studies on feline Betz cells.

Authors:  J M Crawford; D R Curtis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Click-evoked response patterns of single units in the medial geniculate body of the cat.

Authors:  L M Aitkin; C W Dunlop; W R Webster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The inhibitory action of monoamines on lateral geniculate neurones.

Authors:  J W Phillis; A K Tebècis; D H York
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Micro-electrophoretic studies in the cat pulvinar region: effect of acetylcholine.

Authors:  J M Godfraind
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1975-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cholinergic and non-cholinergic transmission in the medial geniculate nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  A K Tebecis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Studies on cholinergic transmission in the medial geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  A K Tebecis
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Observations on the pharmacology of cholinoceptive neurones in the rat brain stem.

Authors:  P B Bradley; A Dray
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Actions of noradrenaline, other sympathomimetic amines and antagonists on neurones in the brain stem of the cat.

Authors:  R J Boakes; P B Bradley; N Brookes; J M Candy; J H Wolstencroft
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Short-latency excitation of brain stem neurones in the rat by acetylcholine.

Authors:  P B Bradley; A Dray
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.739

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.