Literature DB >> 5358582

Measurement of duodenal tryptic activity and 75Se-selenomethionine pancreatic scanning compared as tests of pancreatic function.

D M McCarthy, P Brown.   

Abstract

The results of a subjective assessment of pancreatic function, based on the appearance of a (75)Se-pancreatic scan, were compared with measurements of the tryptic activity of duodenal aspirates in 16 normal and 38 abnormal subjects. In normals and in abnormals whose scans showed a generalized rather than a localized abnormality there was close agreement between the results of the two sets. In patients with a localized abnormality of the pancreatic head on scanning the tryptic activity of the aspirate was useful in differentiating carcinoma of the pancreas from that of the common bile duct. In general the scan was the more discriminative test though otherwise the places of the two tests in diagnosis are rather similar. The particular situations in which each test is valuable, or in which one or other test can be omitted, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1969        PMID: 5358582      PMCID: PMC1553064          DOI: 10.1136/gut.10.11.913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  17 in total

1.  The normal and abnormal pancreatic scan.

Authors:  R N Melmed; J E Agnew; I A Bouchier
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1968-10

2.  Comparison of current radiologic approaches to the diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  S B Eaton; D J Fleischli; J J Pollard; R A Nebesar; M S Potsaid
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The value of percutaneous cholangiography.

Authors:  P George; W B Young; J G Walker; S Sherlock
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Gas-distension, double-contrast duodenography using the Scott-Harden gastroduodenal tube.

Authors:  S Raia; L Kreel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Se methionine as a diagnostic agent in malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  N E Herrera; R Gonzalez; R D Schwartz; A M Diggs; J Belsky
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Pancreatic exocrine function. Comparison of responses to augmented secretin stimulus, augmented pancreozymin stimulus, and test meal in health and disease.

Authors:  R C Hartley; E E Gambill; G W Engstrom; H J Summerskill
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1966-01

7.  Measurement of tryptic activity in intestinal juice as a diagnostic test of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  H B Cook; J E Lennard-Jones; S M Sherif; H S Wiggins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Roentgenologic diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  J Rösch
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1967-07

9.  Pancreatic scanning.

Authors:  D B Sodee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Value of hypotonic duodenography as an adjunct to pancreatic scanning.

Authors:  D M McCarthy; L Kreel; J E Agnew; I A Bouchier
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The Lundh test.

Authors:  O James
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Simultaneous combined pancreatic test.

Authors:  S Nundy; D Shirley; J S Beales; N O'Higgins; R Heaf; E E Pearse; J P Lavender; J H Baron
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-01-19

3.  Trypsin and chymotrypsin as aids in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  D M Goldberg; J K Sale; N Fawcett; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1972-09

4.  Evaluation of the Lundh test in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  G E Levin; G R Youngs; I A Bouchier
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Radiologic and isotopic investigation of the pancreas.

Authors:  I A Bouchier
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1970-05

6.  An evaluation of 75 Se selenomethionine scanning as a test of pancreatic function compared with the secretin-pancreozymin test.

Authors:  J Braganza; M Critchley; H T Howat; H J Testa; H B Torrance
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Factors influencing duodenal trypsin levels following a standard test meal as a test of pancreatic function.

Authors:  I J Zeitlin; W Sircus
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  75 Se-selenomethionine scanning in the diagnosis of tumours of the pancreas and adjacent viscera: the use of the test and its impact on survival.

Authors:  D M McCarthy; P Brown; R N Melmed; J E Agnew; I A Bouchier
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Pancreatic scanning as a diagnostic tool in the district general hospital.

Authors:  A M Spencer; M P Patel; B J Smits; J D Williams
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-10-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.