Literature DB >> 532585

Social rehabilitation following hip fractures.

J S Jensen, E Tøndevold, P H Sørensen.   

Abstract

A prospective 6 months' study of 518 patients with hip fractures was undertaken. The patients were classified into four social function groups on admission to hospital and again at the follow-up, according to their dependence on home-help and other services of the social welfare system. This dependency increased with the age of the patients. Life tables for the case material showed that the mortality depended more on pre-fracture social function than on age. At the follow-up, the risk of death or increased social dependency among primarily independent patients was found to be 38 per cent compared with 48 per cent among slightly dependent patients and 62 per cent in moderately dependent patients. A total of 17 per cent of the surviving patients admitted from home became nursing home patients. The pre-fracture social assessment determined the end-result to a greater extent than the age at the time of fracture. About 75 per cent of the patients discharged to their homes maintained their social function compared with 68 per cent of the patients discharged to a convalescent home and 47 per cent of the patients discharged to rehabilitation clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 532585     DOI: 10.3109/17453677908991309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  9 in total

1.  Institutionalized patients with hip fractures: characteristics associated with returning to community dwelling.

Authors:  J F Fitzgerald; R S Dittus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  J M Mossey; E Mutran; K Knott; R Craik
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Survival experience of aged hip fracture patients.

Authors:  J Magaziner; E M Simonsick; T M Kashner; J R Hebel; J E Kenzora
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The rapid transit system for patients with fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  R W Warne
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-04-06

5.  The mortality and social prognosis of hip fractures. A prospective multifactorial study.

Authors:  R P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Prevention and the elderly: risk factors.

Authors:  R L Kane; R A Kane; S B Arnold
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  [Variations in the incidence of fractures of the upper part of the femur in aged persons in the Quebec region].

Authors:  A Laberge; P M Bernard; L Bernard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Are geriatric units needed for elderly patients with hip fractures?

Authors:  D B Wilson; I D Turpie; C J Patterson; P M Cino; G H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Audit of surgical delay in relationship to outcome after proximal femoral fracture.

Authors:  T R Beringer; V L Crawford; J G Brown
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1996-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.