Literature DB >> 5296131

A comparative study of thick and thin blood films in the diagnosis of scanty malaria parasitaemia.

M A Dowling, G T Shute.   

Abstract

In an attempt to explain the shortcomings of the routine thick-film examination in the diagnosis of scanty malaria parasitaemias, a direct comparison, in terms of positivity and parasite counts, was made between the results of routine thick-film study and long-term examination of thin films taken at the same time from the same individuals. Calculation of the average thickness of the thick and thin films prepared allowed these comparative results to be corrected according to the actual volume of blood examined. From these corrected figures it was observed that both parasite counts and positivity were significantly higher in the thin-film series, and it has been deduced that heavy losses in parasites, varying from 60% to 90%, occurred during the dehaemoglobinization and staining of thick films.The epidemiological implications of this finding in malaria practice are discussed. Emphasis is laid on the importance of further research in order to improve the sensitivity of the routine thick film in the diagnosis of the scanty parasitaemias met with in the later stages of malaria-eradication programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5296131      PMCID: PMC2475932     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  2 in total

1.  THE HEPARINIZED CAPILLARY TUBE AS AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC TOOL. II. CONCENTRATION OF BLOOD PARASITES BY CENTRIFUGATION.

Authors:  R M WORTH
Journal:  Am J Hyg       Date:  1964-07

2.  Factors determining the true reservoir of infection of Plasmodium falciparum and Wuchereria bancrofti in a West African village.

Authors:  R C MUIRHEAD-THOMSON
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 2.184

  2 in total
  50 in total

1.  Dependence of malaria detection and species diagnosis by microscopy on parasite density.

Authors:  F Ellis McKenzie; Jeeraphat Sirichaisinthop; R Scott Miller; Robert A Gasser; Chansuda Wongsrichanalai
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Systematic comparison of two methods to measure parasite density from malaria blood smears.

Authors:  Wendy Prudhomme O'Meara; Shon Remich; Bernhards Ogutu; Martin Lucas; Ramadan Mtalib; Peter Obare; Frederick Oloo; Caroline Onoka; Joseph Osoga; Colin Ohrt; F Ellis McKenzie
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  White blood cell counts and malaria.

Authors:  F Ellis McKenzie; Wendy A Prudhomme; Alan J Magill; J Russ Forney; Barnyen Permpanich; Carmen Lucas; Robert A Gasser; Chansuda Wongsrichanalai
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  ACP Broadsheet no 148. July 1996. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria.

Authors:  D C Warhurst; J E Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Saving Private Ryan: The Indian Scenario (Rapid Diagnosis of Malaria at Regimental Aid Post).

Authors:  S Gokhale
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  Use and limitations of light microscopy for diagnosing malaria at the primary health care level.

Authors:  D Payne
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 7.  Epidemiology and infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gametocytes in relation to malaria control and elimination.

Authors:  Teun Bousema; Chris Drakeley
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Inter-rater reliability of malaria parasite counts and comparison of methods.

Authors:  Katherine M Bowers; David Bell; Peter L Chiodini; John Barnwell; Sandra Incardona; Seiha Yen; Jennifer Luchavez; Hilary Watt
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Assessing agreement between malaria slide density readings.

Authors:  Neal Alexander; David Schellenberg; Billy Ngasala; Max Petzold; Chris Drakeley; Colin Sutherland
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Polymerase chain reaction for screening blood donors at risk for malaria: safe and useful?

Authors:  T Hänscheid; E Valadas; M P Grobusch
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.