Literature DB >> 528865

In vitro studies on skeletogenic potential of membrane bone periosteal cells.

P Thorogood.   

Abstract

In the avian embryo ectomesenchyme cells, derived from the mesencephalic level of the cranial neural crest, migrate into the presumptive maxillary region and subsequently differentiate into the membrane bones and associated secondary cartilage of the upper jaw skeleton. The cartilage arises secondarily within the periosteum at points of articulation between membrane bones and provides an embryonic articulating surface. The stimulus for the differentiation of secondary cartilage is believed to be intermittent pressure and shear created at the developing embryonic movement. The development of one such system--the quadratojugal, has been analysed using organ and explant culture techniques and studied with particular reference to the differentiation of periosteal cells into secondary cartilage. A number of conclusions were reached. (1) Normally only cells at discrete loci express a chondrogenic potential in vivo: the periosteal cells at these sites of future articulation become committed to chondrogenesis during stage 35, more than 24 h before cartilage is identifiable in vivo. (2) However, cells with a 'latent' chondrogenic potential are widespread in membrane bone periosteum and occur over most, if not all, of the surface area of the bone. This potential is expressed in the 'permissive' environment created by submersion of the tissue in explant culture or in submerged organ culture. (3) This chondrogenic potential exists long before the time at which commitment of cartilage-forming cells occurs and even presumptive maxillary ectomesenchyme at stage 29 has a limited ability to form cartilage in vitro. It is suggested that spatial position is a principal factor controlling the differentiation of secondary cartilage. Ectomesenchyme cells with the potential to form secondary cartilage are widespread but it is only those cells whose migration from the neural crest positions them and their progeny at the site of a presumptive joint which subsequently express this potential. This epigenetic interpretation is discussed in the general context of development mechanisms underlying the spatial and temporal patterns in which neural crest-derived cells differentiate to produce bone and cartilage during the formation of the head skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol        ISSN: 0022-0752


  6 in total

1.  Chondroid tissue in the early facial morphogenesis of the chick embryo.

Authors:  B Lengelé; J Schowing; A Dhem
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1996-05

2.  Metopic sutural closure in the human skull.

Authors:  M C Manzanares; M Goret-Nicaise; A Dhem
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Bone vs. fat: embryonic origin of progenitors determines response to androgen in adipocytes and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Kristine M Wiren; Joel G Hashimoto; Anthony A Semirale; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Differentiation of osteoblasts and formation of mineralized bone in vitro.

Authors:  H C Tenenbaum; J N Heersche
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Neural crest cells and skeletogenesis in vertebrate embryos.

Authors:  P Thorogood
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1981-07

6.  Fracture repair of reptilian dermal bones: can reptiles form secondary cartilage?

Authors:  C R Irwin; M W Ferguson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.610

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.