Literature DB >> 5288242

Geographic distribution and light-dependent behavior in Drosophila.

J Grossfield.   

Abstract

Drosophila species fall into three classes with respect to the effect of light on their reproductive behavior: Class I, species that mate equally well in light or darkness; Class II, those merely inhibited by darkness; Class III, species whose mating is blocked by darkness. Species in the three classes also differ in the extent of their geographic distribution, with Class I including widely distributed and cosmopolitan species and Class III those that are endemic. Class II species have an intermediate distribution pattern. The behavioral differences among species reflects the degree to which courtship information is locked-in on unique visual stimuli, as well as indicating differences in the underlying genetic architecture of flexible versus specialized forms. It may be anticipated that most species of Drosophila will be found light dependent. Similar organizational differences in other forms relying on visual courtship stimuli may be reflected in correlation between distribution and behavioral reliance on a single sensory input. Dependence on a single sensory input offers a unique variety of methods for biological control of species that requires a particular sensory system for information transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1971        PMID: 5288242      PMCID: PMC389497          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.68.11.2669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  A preliminary histological study of the insemination reaction in Drosophila gibberosa.

Authors:  H T Y LEE
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  1950-02       Impact factor: 1.818

2.  Behavioral differentiation of three races of Drosophila auraria.

Authors:  J Grossfield
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1971 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Abnormal electroretinograms in visual mutants of Drosophila.

Authors:  Y Hotta; S Benzer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Nonphototactic mutants in a study of vision of Drosophila.

Authors:  W L Pak; J Grossfield; N V White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Eradicating mosquitoes using translocations.

Authors:  H Laven
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-03-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Chromosome interactions affecting mating speed in Drosophila robusta.

Authors:  S Prakash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Analysis of the stimuli involved in courtship and mating in D. malerkotliana (sophophora, Drosophila).

Authors:  R D Narda
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1966 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Drosophilid mating behavior: the behaviour of decapitated females.

Authors:  H T Spieth
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1966 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  MATING OF THE HOUSE FLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA L., IN MONITORED DARKNESS.

Authors:  W M ROGOFF
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 2.278

  9 in total
  22 in total

1.  Relationship between larval feeding behavior and viability in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  S Ohnishi
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  The influence of light on pupation height in Drosophila.

Authors:  E M Schnebel; J Grossfield
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Joseph Grossfield (1940-1987).

Authors:  L Ehrman
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Multiple-choice selection for light preference in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  V Kekic; D Marinkovic D+MARINKOVIC
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  The visual component in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Burnet; K Connolly
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1973-04-15

6.  The use of behavioral mutants in biological control.

Authors:  J Grossfield
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Selection for copulation ability of Drosophila subobscura in the absence of light.

Authors:  M Andjelković; D Marinković
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Genetic and sensory aspects of mating success of phototactic strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T A Markow
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Phototactic responses along a gradient of light intensities for the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Behavior in different environments of populations of Drosophila, pseudoobscura selected for phototaxis and geotaxis.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; C L Judson; O Pavlovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.