Literature DB >> 5216216

The connection between magnitude and discrimination scales and direct and indirect scaling methods.

H Eisler.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1965        PMID： 5216216     DOI： 10.1007/bf02289491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN： 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Measurement of moral judgment: a comparison of scaling methods.

Authors:  G EKMAN
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1962-08

2.  The relation between category and magnitude scales of loudness.

Authors:  E GALANTER; S MESSICK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Psychological models for relating discrimination and magnitude estimation scales.

Authors:  C E HELM; S MESSICK; L R TUCKER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  On the psychophysical law.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The amount of information in absolute judgements.

Authors:  W R GARNER; H W HAKE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  An equal discriminability scale for loudness judgments.

Authors:  W R GARNER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-03
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Distributional versus error-filled procedures for transformation.

Authors:  M H Birnbaum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-03

2.  Bisection of loudness.

Authors:  E C Carterette; N H Anderson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-10

3.  The normal distribution in scaling subjective stimulus differences: less "normal" than we think?

Authors:  A Hellström
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.