Literature DB >> 517587

Local versus general anesthesia: which is safer for performing suction curettage abortions?

D A Grimes, K F Schulz, W Cates, C W Tyler.   

Abstract

The relative safety of suction curettage abortions performed with either local or general anesthesia has not been clearly established. To compare the safety of these two anesthetic techniques, we studied 36,430 women who received local anesthetics and 17,725 who received general anesthetics for this operation in the United States from 1971 through 1975. The aggregated major complication rates for the two groups were similar, but there were significant differences between local and general anesthesia for specific complications and treatments. Local anesthesia was associated with higher rates of febrile and convulsive morbidity; however, general anesthesia was associated with higher rates of hemorrhage, cervical injury, and uterine perforation. Both anesthetic techniques appear to be safe, with similar degrees of overall safety, although each is associated with a different spectrum of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 517587     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90731-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  The use of hospital resources to treat incomplete abortions: examples from Latin America.

Authors:  J A Fortney
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  General anaesthesia, a risk factor for complication following induced abortion?

Authors:  J F Osborn; E Arisi; A Spinelli; M A Stazi
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Factors associated with immediate abortion complications.

Authors:  L E Ferris; M McMain-Klein; N Colodny; G F Fellows; J Lamont
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Induced abortion operations and their early sequelae. Joint study of the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.