Literature DB >> 515841

Somatosensory evoked potentials during decompression and stabilization of the spine. Methods and findings.

N I Spielholz, M V Benjamin, G L Engler, J Ransohoff.   

Abstract

As part of a study to determine if decompressive surgery benefits patients who have incomplete lesions of the spinal cord, the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) has been employed as an intraoperative spinal cord monitor. This procedure was used to see if decompression results in any rapid changes in spinal cord conductivity and to correlate these findings with the patient's subsequent clinical course. In addition to trauma, however, other factors also affect the SEP, and these must be recognized if intraoperative monitoring is to be successful. Frequency of stimulation, wakefulness, and anesthetic agents alter the wave-form and amplitude of the SEP. Using nitrous oxide, oxygen, meperidine (or morphine), and a muscle relaxant for anesthesia, and stimulating at frequencies of 1 or 2 per second, 11 patients with cervical or upper thoracic lesions have been monitored. There was no loss or diminution of an SEP and no patient was neurologically poorer afterwards. In 4 patients, the SEP "improved" soon after decompression. Clinical outcome, however, was not related to whether the SEP changed or remained the same. In total, 8 patients subsequently improved functionally and 3 did not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 515841     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-197911000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  J Richard Toleikis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  W Hacke
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Evoked potentials and brain stem reflexes.

Authors:  N Klug; G S Csécsei
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring.

Authors:  John M Flynn; Denis S Sakai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Measurement of spinal cord ischemia during operations upon the thoracic aorta: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  J N Cunningham; J C Laschinger; H A Merkin; I M Nathan; S Colvin; J Ransohoff; F C Spencer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Loss of intraoperative evoked responses during dorsal column surgery associated with isolated postoperative sensory deficit.

Authors:  A Schubert; M M Todd; T G Luerssen; G E Hicks
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1987-10

7.  Comparison of somatosensory evoked responses from root and cord recorded by skin and epidural electrodes using stimulation of the median nerve in cervical radiculopathy and radiculomyelopathy.

Authors:  M Heiskari; U Tolonen; S H Nyström
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Sensitivity and specificity in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Takashi Tashiro; Akira Gomi; Junko Takanashi; Hiroshi Ujiie
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-08-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.