Literature DB >> 5142387

Suppression of operant vs consummatory behavior.

M J DeCosta, J J Ayres.   

Abstract

The magnitude and variability of conditioned suppression of bar pressing and dipper licking were compared. In two steady-state experiments, suppression of bar pressing was more profound and more stable from day to day. The two measures of suppression were uncorrelated as indexed by Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients computed for adjacent trials. Correlations within measures (internal consistency) were somewhat higher for the bar-press system except when a high proportion of rats completely suppressed on one of the correlated trials. In a transient state experiment in which possible adventitious punishment of both response systems was eliminated, suppression of bar pressing was again more profound and considerably slower to extinguish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1971        PMID: 5142387      PMCID: PMC1333832          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  SOME NOTES ON CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION AND REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES.

Authors:  D O LYON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.

Authors:  Z ANNAU; L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-08

3.  AN AVERSIVE STIMULUS AS A CORRELATED BLOCK COUNTER IN FR PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  J F DARDANO; D SAUERBRUNN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF FIXED-RATIO PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  J F DARDANO; D SAUERBRUNN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Differentially conditioned suppression as a function of shock intensity and incentive.

Authors:  J J Ayres
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

7.  Simple method for CER conditioning and measurement.

Authors:  R C Leaf; S A Muller
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-08

8.  Recovery time as a measure of CER strength: effects of benzodiazepines, amobarbital, chlorpromazine and amphetamine.

Authors:  S S Tenen
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1967

9.  Conditioned suppression and the information hypothesis.

Authors:  J J Ayres
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-08
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Conditioned suppression of counting behavior in rats.

Authors:  D E Blackman; P Scruton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of punishing elements of a simple instrumental-consummatory response chain.

Authors:  J S Myer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Differential vulnerability to the punishment of cocaine related behaviours: effects of locus of punishment, cocaine taking history and alternative reinforcer availability.

Authors:  Yann Pelloux; Jennifer E Murray; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.530

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.