Literature DB >> 5072236

A method for measuring human behavioural and physiological responses at different stress levels in a driving simulator.

H Ashton, R D Savage, J W Thompson, D W Watson.   

Abstract

1. A method is described by which a car simulator can be used to measure, simultaneously, motor-perceptual performance and physiological responses of human subjects under different levels of task difficulty or stress.2. Motor-perceptual performance was measured in terms of reaction times taken by subjects to carry out steering, braking and operation of traffic indicators in the simulator. Subjects were instructed to carry out the different driving manoeuvres by means of a command panel containing five coloured lights. Three levels of task difficulty or stress were devised. In level 1 only the light signals were used. In level 2 the driving simulator film was shown and all of the light signals reinforced the movements of the car in the film. Level 3 was similar to level 2, with the exception that whilst some of the light signals reinforced the movements of the car, others deliberately conflicted with it.3. Physiological responses measured were heart rate, blood pressure, respiration and calf blood flow. Personality was also measured by means of the Cattell 16 personality factor questionnaire.4. Analysis of variance of the performance of 15 subjects showed significant variation between the three task levels (P=<0.001 for steering reaction times; P=<0.01 for brake and indicator reaction times). In all cases the reaction times were longest for level 3, indicating that this was the most difficult task. The number of anticipated responses to steering, braking and traffic indicator signals was highest in level 2, while the number of corrections to steering and braking responses was lowest in level 2. None of these differences was statistically significant.5. Of the physiological variables, the heart rate showed a progressive increase from task levels 1 to 3 but only those between levels 1 and 3 were statistically significant (P<0.05).6. The results are discussed in relation to the validity of the method. It is concluded that by means of this method it is possible to produce controlled and reproducible degrees of stress and under conditions which are also suitable for the investigation of pharmacological agents upon it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5072236      PMCID: PMC1666168          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1972.tb08111.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  9 in total

Review 1.  VIGILANCE.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Effect of small doses of alcohol on a skill resembling driving.

Authors:  G C DREW; W P COLQUHOUN; H A LONG
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1958-10-25

3.  Some effects of unequal spatial distribution on the detectability of radar targets.

Authors:  P E NICELY; G A MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-03

4.  Experimental studies of behavioral effects of meprobamate on normal subjects.

Authors:  D G MARQUIS; E L KELLY; J G MILLER; R W GERARD; A RAPOPORT
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1957-05-09       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Comparative sedative effects of a barbiturate and some tranquilizer drugs on normal subjects.

Authors:  T A LOOMIS; T C WEST
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  The influence of alcohol on automobile driving ability; an experimental study for the evaluation of certain medicological aspects.

Authors:  T A LOOMIS; T C WEST
Journal:  Q J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1958-03

7.  Effect of beta-adrenergic blockade and alcohol on simulated car driving.

Authors:  V Goldman; B Comerford; D Hughes; G Nyberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Use of a racing car simulator for medical research the effects of marzine and alcohol on driving performance.

Authors:  D T Hughes; F Cramer; G J Knight
Journal:  Med Sci Law       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 1.266

9.  The effects of cigarette smoking on the response to stress in a driving simulator.

Authors:  H Ashton; R D Savage; R Telford; J W Thompson; D W Watson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 8.739

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Mental stress assessment using simultaneous measurement of EEG and fNIRS.

Authors:  Fares Al-Shargie; Masashi Kiguchi; Nasreen Badruddin; Sarat C Dass; Ahmad Fadzil Mohammad Hani; Tong Boon Tang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  The effects of cigarette smoking on the response to stress in a driving simulator.

Authors:  H Ashton; R D Savage; R Telford; J W Thompson; D W Watson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  The acute physiological stress response to driving: A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Antoun; Kate M Edwards; Joanna Sweeting; Ding Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.