Literature DB >> 502494

Effects of five experimental treatments of stuttering.

R Martin, S K Haroldson.   

Abstract

Twenty adult stutterers were exposed to each of five experimental treatments: time-out, noise, delayed auditory feedback (DAF), "wrong" and metronome. In each session a subject spoke for 20 minutes without treatment (baserate) followed by 30 minutes in one of the five experimental conditions. Before the five treatment sessions, subjects accomplished three pre-experimental tasks: expectancy, changeability, and adaptation tasks. Percent stuttering decreased significantly in all conditions, and stuttering duration reduced significantly in all but the noise condition. The amount of reduction in percent stuttering from baserate to treatment (change score) in time-out was positively related to the change scores in DAF and metronome. Change scores in metronome were positively related to change scores in time-out and "wrong." Percent stuttering change scores in noise, DAF, and "wrong" were essentially unrelated. Stuttering duration change scores were related only for the time-out and DAF, and metronome and DAF conditions. In general, the pre-experimental expectancy, changeability, and adaptation scores were unrelated to change scores in any of the experimental conditions. Words spoken per minute did not change significantly from baserate to treatment for any experimental condition except time-out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 502494     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2201.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  6 in total

1.  Measurement of speech effort during fluency-inducing conditions in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Erin Jang; Lauren Yates; John Cotton; Irene Seybold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; John Houde; Feng Rong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Phonation interval modification and speech performance quality during fluency-inducing conditions by adults who stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Yuedong Wang; Krystal Purkhiser; Anneliese New
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Controlled trial of speech therapy versus oxprenolol for stammering.

Authors:  L Rustin; A Kuhr; P J Cook; I M James
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-08-22

5.  Mental imagery of speech: linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  An Adapting Auditory-motor Feedback Loop Can Contribute to Generating Vocal Repetition.

Authors:  Jason D Wittenbach; Kristofer E Bouchard; Michael S Brainard; Dezhe Z Jin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.