Literature DB >> 5019998

Lick-shock contingencies in the rat.

V L Quinsey.   

Abstract

Hungry rats were allowed to lick an 8% sucrose solution and then one of four lick-shock contingency conditions was superimposed on the licking baseline. These conditions were: free-operant avoidance, free shock, punishment, and no shock. From highest to lowest response rates, the groups fell in the order-avoidance, no shock, free shock, and punishment. Lick rates adjusted rapidly to introduction and removal of the contingencies. Post-shock responding was lowest in the punishment condition and highest in the free shock condition. No method was found simultaneously to equate shock frequency and separate response rates for the three shock contingency conditions. Only small, or no, reductions in shock rate occurred over sessions under the free-operant avoidance schedule when the shock-shock interval was 10 sec but large reductions occurred when the shock-shock interval was reduced to either 1 or 2 sec.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5019998      PMCID: PMC1333901          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  An analysis of the behavior of rats and monkeys on concurrent fixed-ratio avoidance schedules.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of amphetamine on forced drinking in the rat.

Authors:  P TEITELBAUM; P DERKS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-12

3.  Conditioned suppression under positive, negative, and no contingency between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  H Davis; R W McIntire
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent fixed-ratio and avoidance responding in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  A C Catania; J F Deegan; L Cook
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Temporal relationship between response and punishment.

Authors:  D S Camp; G A Raymond; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.