Literature DB >> 5016359

Membrane potentials recorded from the mucosa of the toad's tongue during chemical stimulation.

C Eyzaguirre, S Fidone, P Zapata.   

Abstract

An isolated stretch of tongue mucosa was obtained from the Chilean toad (Callyptocephalella gayi). The preparation was observed under transmitted illumination through a binocular microscope. The surface cells were impaled with micro-electrodes and different chemical agents were applied to the area. The following results were obtained.1. The surface cells had resting potentials of -6 to -40 mV (mean of -17.6 mV) with the preparation bathed in Ringer solution.2. The cells underwent depolarization by application of different salts (NaCl, NaF, KCl, Na(2)SO(4), CaCl(2) and MgCl(2)) in concentrations of 0.25-1.0 M. The potentials evoked by the salt solutions often overshot the zero membrane potential level by several millivolts. The positive-going potential change produced by application of salts was increased during hyperpolarization of the membrane by inward current and was decreased by current of the opposite sign. Application of salts during depolarization of the membrane to a certain positive level produced a negative-going potential change. The potentials evoked by different salts were about the same, qualitatively, when recordings were made from different areas of the tongue, i.e. top of the fungiform and filiform papillae, doughnut-shaped folds at the base of the fungiform papillae, areas between papillae and from the side of the tongue totally devoid of papillary structures.3. Quinine applied in concentrations of 2 x 10(-2)M did not change the resting polarization of the surface epithelial cells. However, quinine applied to cells already depolarized by outward currents induced further depolarization. When it was delivered to cells hyperpolarized by inward current the substance induced further hyperpolarization.4. Sucrose (0.5-1.0 M) did not change the membrane potential of lingual cells regardless of the level of cell polarization induced by injected currents.5. Hydrochloric, sulphuric, nitric and acetic acids produced minimal biphasic effects: a brief hyperpolarization followed by a slower secondary depolarization.6. Water increased the membrane potential of the surface cells. Salts applied at the peak of the water-evoked hyperpolarization induced cell depolarization which was much larger than that evoked during application of salts to cells bathed in Ringer solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5016359      PMCID: PMC1331349          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  11 in total

1.  SOLID-STATE ELECTROMETERS WITH INPUT-CAPACITANCE NEUTRALIZATION.

Authors:  H FEIN
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1964 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  DUAL MODE OF SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION IN THE AVIAN CILIARY GANGLION.

Authors:  A R MARTIN; G PILAR
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  [The gustatory sensitivity of the frog].

Authors:  G RAPUZZI; A PEDRINI
Journal:  Arch Sci Biol (Bologna)       Date:  1963 Jan-Mar

4.  Microelectrode study of taste receptors of rat and hamster.

Authors:  K KIMURA; L M BEIDLER
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1961-10

5.  The pH sensitivity of the chloride conductance of frog skeletal muscle.

Authors:  O F Hutter; A E Warner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The fine structure of fungiform papillae and epithelium of the tongue of a South American toad, Calyptocephalella gayi.

Authors:  L J Stensaas
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1971-08

7.  [Slow electric potentials of the lingual surface during activation of the gustatory receptors in the frog].

Authors:  G Rapuzzi; G Ricagno
Journal:  Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper       Date:  1969-01-15

8.  The response of frog taste cells (Rana nigromaculata and Rana catesbeana).

Authors:  T Sato
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1969

9.  The role of the nerve in maintenance of frog taste buds.

Authors:  N Robbins
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  THE RECEPTOR POTENTIAL OF THE TASTE CELL OF THE RAT.

Authors:  H TATEDA; L M BEIDLER
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  1 in total

1.  Electrical responses to taste chemicals across the dorsal epithelium of bullfrog tongue.

Authors:  H Soeda; F Sakudo
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1985-01-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.