Literature DB >> 5014615

The role of intraluminal sodium in glucose absorption in vivo.

D A Saltzman, F C Rector, J S Fordtran.   

Abstract

Active glucose absorption is thought to depend on a gradient of sodium ion concentration across the brush border membrane of intestinal epithelial cells. This concept is generally accepted, although its validity has never been adequately evaluated in the human small intestine in vivo. According to this hypothesis, the rate of glucose absorption should decrease markedly if the luminal sodium concentration is markedly reduced, and glucose absorption against a concentration gradient should cease entirely if luminal sodium is lower than intracellular sodium concentration. In the present series of experiments we were not able to show an important role of intraluminal sodium concentration in the active absorption of glucose from the human, rat, and dog ileum in vivo. Specifically, glucose absorption was minimally reduced or not reduced at all when intraluminal sodium concentration was reduced from 140 to as low as 2.5 mEq/liter. The discrepancy between our results and those of previous workers whose data suggest that removal of intraluminal sodium should markedly inhibit active glucose absorption is not entirely clear, but there are a number of differences in experimental design between most previous studies and our own. Although our data show that active glucose absorption proceeds at a near normal rate even when lumen sodium concentration is reduced below 3 mEq/liter, our results do not disprove the sodium gradient theory because of the theoretic possibility that the microclimate adjacent to the brush border has a high concentration of sodium even when luminal sodium concentration is markedly reduced. The validity of the sodium gradient hypothesis would appear to be critically dependent on such a microclimate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5014615      PMCID: PMC302201          DOI: 10.1172/JCI106882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  20 in total

1.  SOME EFFECTS OF CATIONS AND OF WATER ABSORPTION ON INTESTINAL HEXOSE, GLYCINE AND CATION ABSORPTION.

Authors:  J H ANNEGERS
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1964 Aug-Sep

2.  Hypothesis for mechanism of intestinal active transport of sugars.

Authors:  R K CRANE
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1962 Nov-Dec

3.  Effect of digitalis on active intestinal sugar transport.

Authors:  T Z CSAKY; H G HARTZOG; G W FERNALD
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1961-03

4.  Effects of cations on sugar absorption by isolated surviving guinea pig intestine.

Authors:  E RIKLIS; J H QUASTEL
Journal:  Can J Biochem Physiol       Date:  1958-03

Review 5.  Coupled transport of sodium and organic solutes.

Authors:  S G Schultz; P F Curran
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Coupling between transport processes in intestine.

Authors:  P F Curran
Journal:  Physiologist       Date:  1968-02

7.  The sodium-alanine interaction in rabbit ileum. Effect of alanine on sodium fluxes.

Authors:  P F Curran; J J Hajjar; I M Glynn
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Sodium and sugar fluxes across the mucosal border of rabbit ileum.

Authors:  A M Goldner; S G Schultz; P F Curran
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  The role of sodium in intestinal glucose absorption in man.

Authors:  W A Olsen; F J Ingelfinger
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  The mechanisms of sodium absorption in the human small intestine.

Authors:  J S Fordtran; F C Rector; N W Carter
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  15 in total

1.  Water and solute absorption from hypotonic glucose-electrolyte solutions in human jejunum.

Authors:  J B Hunt; E J Elliott; P D Fairclough; M L Clark; M J Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Sugar and electrolyte absorption in the rat intestine perfused "in vivo".

Authors:  G Esposito; A Faelli; V Capraro
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1973-06-04       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Effect of sodium concentration and plasma sugar concentration on hexose absorption by the rat jejunum in vivo. Further evidence of two transport mechanisms.

Authors:  E S Debnam
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Na dependence of monosaccharide absorption in isolated rabbit small intestine, perfused through lumen and vascular bed.

Authors:  T Mothes; H Remke; F Müller
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Transport kinetics of D-glucose in human small intestinal mucosa: rate constants in histologically normal and abnormal mucosal biopsies.

Authors:  A B Thomson; W M Weinstein
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Influence of vascular flow on amino acid transport across frog small intestine.

Authors:  D S Parsons; I R Sanderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Demonstration of electrogenic Na+-dependent D-glucose transport in intestinal brush border membranes.

Authors:  H Murer; U Hopfer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Influence of viscous incubation media on the resistance to diffusion of the intestinal unstirred water layer in vitro.

Authors:  I T Johnson; J M Gee
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Evidence of a dominant role for low osmolality in the efficacy of cereal based oral rehydration solutions: studies in a model of secretory diarrhoea.

Authors:  A V Thillainayagam; S Carnaby; J A Dias; M L Clark; M J Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  The effect of amino acids and dipeptides on sodium and water absorption in man.

Authors:  M D Hellier; C Thirumalai; C D Holdsworth
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.