Literature DB >> 499187

Aerobic performance of female marathon and male ultramarathon athletes.

C T Davies, M W Thompson.   

Abstract

The aerobic performance of thirteen male ultramarathon and nine female marathon runners were studied in the laboratory and their results were related to their times in events ranging in distance from 5 km to 84.64 km. The mean maximal aerobic power output (VO2 max) of the men was 72.5 ml/kg . min compared with 58.2 ml/kg . min (p less than 0.001) in the women but the O2 cost (VO2) for a given speed or distance of running was the same in both sexes. The 5 km time of the male athletes was closely related to their VO2 max (r = -0.85) during uphill running but was independent of relative power output (%VO2 max). However, with increasing distance the association of VO2 max with male athletic performance diminished (but nevertheless remained significant even at 84.64 km), and the relationship between %VO2 max and time increased. Thus, using multiple regression analysis of the form: 42.2 km (marathon) time (h) = 7.445 - 0.0338 VO2 max (ml/kg . min) - 0.0303% VO2 max (r = 0.993) and 84.64 km (London-Brighton) time (h) = 16.998 - 0.0735 VO2 max (ml/kg . min) - 0.0844% VO2 max (r = 0.996) approximately 98% of the total variance of performance times could be accounted for in the marathon and ultramarathon events. This suggests that other factors such as footwear, clothing, and running technique (Costill, 1972) play a relatively minor role in this group of male distance runners. In the female athletes the intermediate times were not available and they did not compete beyond 42.2 km (marathon) distance but for this event a similar association though less in magnitude was found with VO2 max (r = -0.43) and %VO2 max (= -0.49). The male athletes were able to sustain 82% VO2 max (range 80--87%) in 42.2 km and 67% VO2 max (range 53--76%) in 84.64 km event. The comparable figure for the firls in the marathon was 79% VO2 max (ranges 68--86%). Our data suggests that success at the marathon and ultramarathon distances is crucially and (possibly) solely dependent on the development and utilisation of a large VO2 max.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 499187     DOI: 10.1007/bf00429740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  25 in total

1.  Energy cost of running.

Authors:  R MARGARIA; P CERRETELLI; P AGHEMO; G SASSI
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Maximal oxygen uptake in athletes.

Authors:  B Saltin; P O Astrand
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Thermoregulatory responses during competitive marathon running.

Authors:  M B Maron; J A Wagner; S M Horvath
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1977-06

4.  Oxygen uptake measurements during competitive marathon running.

Authors:  M B Maron; S M Horvath; J E Wilkerson; J A Gliner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Submaximal and maximal working capacity of elite distance runners. Part I: Cardiorespiratory aspects.

Authors:  M L Pollock
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Aerobic responses of female distance runners to submaximal and maximal exercise.

Authors:  J Daniels; G Krahenbuhl; C Foster; J Gilbert; S Daniels
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Letter: Relationship between speed of running and distance run.

Authors:  T Khosla
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Fluid and electrolyte balance during the comrades marathon.

Authors:  C P Dancaster; S J Whereat
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1971-02-06

9.  Determinants of Marathon running success.

Authors:  D L Costill; G Branam; D Eddy; K Sparks
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1971

10.  Oxygen intake in track and treadmill running with observations on the effect of air resistance.

Authors:  L G Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  The effect of endurance training on parameters of aerobic fitness.

Authors:  A M Jones; H Carter
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Methods to determine aerobic endurance.

Authors:  Laurent Bosquet; Luc Léger; Patrick Legros
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The role of anaerobic ability in middle distance running performance.

Authors:  J A Houmard; D L Costill; J B Mitchell; S H Park; T C Chenier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

4.  Modelling bivariate relationships when repeated measurements are recorded on more than one subject.

Authors:  A M Nevill; C B Cooke; R L Holder; R Ramsbottom; C Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

5.  Relationship between record time and maximal oxygen consumption in middle-distance running.

Authors:  G Camus
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

6.  Neuromuscular factors determining 5 km running performance and running economy in well-trained athletes.

Authors:  Ari T Nummela; Leena M Paavolainen; Karen A Sharwood; Mike I Lambert; Timothy D Noakes; Heikki K Rusko
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Sex differences in performance-matched marathon runners.

Authors:  J Helgerud; F Ingjer; S B Strømme
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

8.  Air temperature and physiological and subjective responses during competitive singles tennis.

Authors:  Sarah M Morante; John R Brotherhood
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Determinants of five kilometre running performance in active men and women.

Authors:  R Ramsbottom; M G Nute; C Williams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Maximal oxygen uptake, anaerobic threshold and running economy in women and men with similar performances level in marathons.

Authors:  J Helgerud
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.