Literature DB >> 4958615

An inhibitory process in the cerebral cortex.

K Krnjević, M Randić, D W Straughan.   

Abstract

1. In cats, rabbits and monkeys, single cortical shocks can reduce the excitability of cortical neurones for 100-300 msec; the inhibitory effect is readily demonstrated, even in previously quiescent cells, against a background of activity evoked with small amounts of L-glutamate, released from an extracellular recording micropipette by iontophoresis.2. Other forms of cortical activity are also inhibited in a similar way by direct or indirect cortical stimulation; they include single unit discharges produced by iontophoretic applications of ACh or by a cathodal current, spontaneous discharges, and slow wave activity, both spontaneous and evoked.3. Most stimuli which elicit cortical activity also evoke some inhibition in the cortex, for instance, transcallosal volleys, and thalamic or peripheral shocks. In each case, a characteristic, prolonged depression is produced by single shocks.4. The most effective stimuli are direct cortical shocks, especially when applied within the cortex, below a depth of 0.6 mm; surface cathodal shocks are more effective than anodal shocks. These stimuli do not first excite the cells which are inhibited and they are not strong enough to cause appreciable local injury.5. Because of its long duration, the inhibition is often readily maintained by repetitive stimulation at frequencies of 5-7/sec. A cumulative effect leads to a further silent period after the end of stimulation; this increases with the strength, frequency and duration of the tetanus, so that after stimulation at 50-100/sec, the silent period may last for over 1 min. During this time, a stronger depolarizing stimulus can initiate firing.6. The inhibitory effect is often preceded and followed by phases of increased excitability; these may also show cumulative enhancement during repetitive stimulation, and a high frequency tetanus often leads to a short after-discharge, which is then followed by a long silent period, as above. Comparable changes take place in rabbits during spreading depression.7. The inhibitory effect of a direct shock can spread over an area covering 1 cm of cortical surface, affecting the cells through all cortical layers; but the spread is uneven in different directions, being particularly poor under most sulci.8. This type of inhibition can be elicited in all areas of the neocortex, and it is evident in kittens within a week of birth.9. Antidromic pyramidal stimulation is very much less effective in evoking inhibition of Betz cells, and other cortical neurones, than direct cortical stimulation; the inhibition by direct shocks is therefore not likely to be mediated through pyramidal excitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1966        PMID: 4958615      PMCID: PMC1357546          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  30 in total

1.  CORTICAL INHIBITION.

Authors:  K KRNJEVIC; M RANDIC; D W STRAUGHAN
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  CORTICAL INTRACELLULAR POTENTIALS DURING AUGMENTING AND RECRUITING RESPONSES. I. EFFECTS OF INJECTED HYPERPOLARIZING CURRENTS ON EVOKED MEMBRANE POTENTIAL CHANGES.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; R J SHOFER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spreading cortical depression of Leao.

Authors:  W H MARSHALL
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  RECURRENT CORTICAL EFFECTS FOLLOWING STIMULATION OF MEDULLARY PYRAMID.

Authors:  V B BROOKS; H ASANUMA
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  1965-06-10       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  The myeloarchitectonics of the frontal cortex of the dog.

Authors:  J KREINER
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination.

Authors:  V B MOUNTCASTLE; T P POWELL
Journal:  Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp       Date:  1959-10

7.  Inhibition of Betz cell activity by thalamic and cortical stimulation.

Authors:  C L BRANCH; A R MARTIN
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Some relations between resistivity and electrical activity in the cerebral cortex of the cat.

Authors:  W H FREYGANG; W M LANDAU
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1955-06

9.  Microelectrode studies of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex in the cat.

Authors:  C L LI; H JASPER
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1953-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Pharmacology of cortical inhibition.

Authors:  K Krnjević; M Randić; D W Straughan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  32 in total

1.  Unexpected reflex response to transmastoid stimulation in human subjects during near-maximal effort.

Authors:  J L Taylor; J E Butler; N T Petersen; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Interaction of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical transmastoid stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor; N T Petersen; Jane E Butler; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Electrophysiological correlates of short-latency afferent inhibition: a combined EEG and TMS study.

Authors:  Rozaliya Bikmullina; Dubravko Kicić; Synnöve Carlson; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Synaptic processes in pericruciate cortical neurons evoked by pyramidal tract stimulation in cats.

Authors:  A G Zadorozhnyi; T V Vasechko
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1976 Jan-Mar

5.  Peculiarities of inhibition in cat auditory cortex neurons evoked by tonal stimuli of various durations.

Authors:  I O Volkov; A V Galazyuk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The EEG correlates of the TMS-induced EMG silent period in humans.

Authors:  Faranak Farzan; Mera S Barr; Sylco S Hoppenbrouwers; Paul B Fitzgerald; Robert Chen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Dissociation of cortical areas responsible for evoking excitatory and inhibitory responses in the small hand muscles.

Authors:  J P Lewko; D S Stokić; I M Tarkka
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli in resting, active, and recently activated muscles.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; A Samii; B Mercuri; K Ikoma; D Oddo; S E Grill; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Microstimulation of V1 delays visually guided saccades: a parametric evaluation of delay fields.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Methodology for combined TMS and EEG.

Authors:  Risto J Ilmoniemi; Dubravko Kicić
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.