Literature DB >> 4919142

Cellular and vascular components of the allograft reaction. Evidence from returned skin allografts.

P B Lambert, H A Frank.   

Abstract

In order to gain added insight into the mechanisms of allograft destruction, skin grafts were returned to their original donors after remaining as allografts long enough to induce immunity in the intermediate host but not long enough to cause destruction of the graft. Upon their return to unmodified donors, such grafts became revascularized and remained viable. An intense cellular infiltration was incited within the graft and its draining lymph node by the interaction between immunologically competent cells, some antigenically activated, that were transferred from the intermediate host with the graft, and those of the final host, the original donor. This immune interaction excited a nonspecific granulocytic and histiocytic response, which led to the destruction of the adjacent epithelium already re-accepted within its native habitat. This mechanism of epithelial destruction required vascular connection to permit the cellular infiltration, and was unlikely to have primarily involved circulating antibody. When similar grafts were returned to donors that had been sensitized to the intermediate host, vascularization and reacceptance of the graft did not occur. No cellular infiltration took place in the graft and no lymph node response was evoked. The returned grafts were cast off as full-thickness sloughs. Here the mechanism of graft rejection was apparently an interaction between the preformed antibody of the specifically sensitized host and the allogeneic cells transferred from the intermediate host; this interaction prevented the vascularization of the graft, even though the endothelia involved were autologous. In unmodified allografts, both the character and the variability of the histologic patterns can be accounted for by the superimposition, in differing rates and degrees, of humoral vascular effects upon cellular events already in progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1970        PMID: 4919142      PMCID: PMC2138875          DOI: 10.1084/jem.132.5.868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  13 in total

1.  Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research.

Authors:  M SIMONSEN
Journal:  Prog Allergy       Date:  1962

2.  A simple method for inducing tolerance of skin homografts in mice.

Authors:  R E BILLINGHAM; L BRENT
Journal:  Transplant Bull       Date:  1957-04

3.  Studies on reversibility of homograft rejection.

Authors:  M T EDGERTON; P J EDGERTON
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1957

4.  The behaviour and fate of skin autografts and skin homografts in rabbits: A report to the War Wounds Committee of the Medical Research Council.

Authors:  P B Medawar
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1944-10       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  W J Dempster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1968-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Pathogenesis of a local graft versus host reaction: immunogenicity of circulating host leukocytes.

Authors:  W L Elkins; R D Guttmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The H-Y transplantation antigen: a Y-linked or sex-influenced factor?

Authors:  W K Silvers; R E Billingham; B H Sanford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Immunization with skin isografts taken from tolerant mice.

Authors:  D Steinmuller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Skin heterogenizing virus.

Authors:  G J Svet-Moldavsky; D M Mkheidze; A L Liozner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Autograft rejection. I. Effect of prior transplantation to allogeneic and xenogeneic hosts.

Authors:  C Brautbar; D Nelken; J H Boss
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  The role of passenger leukocytes in the anomalous survival of neonatal skin grafts in mice.

Authors:  S S Wachtel; W K Silvers
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1972-02-01       Impact factor: 14.307

2.  Cellular requirements for the rejection of skin allografts in rats.

Authors:  D M Lubaroff
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1973-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.