Literature DB >> 490143

Receptive field mechanisms of cat X and Y retinal ganglion cells.

J D Victor, R M Shapley.   

Abstract

We investigated receptive field properties of cat retinal ganglion cells with visual stimuli which were sinusoidal spatial gratings amplitude modulated in time by a sum of sinusoids. Neural responses were analyzed into the Fourier components at the input frequencies and the components at sum and difference frequencies. The first-order frequency response of X cells had a marked spatial phase and spatial frequency dependence which could be explained in terms of linear interactions between center and surround mechanisms in the receptive field. The second-order frequency response of X cells was much smaller than the first-order frequency response at all spatial frequencies. The spatial phase and spatial frequency dependence of the first-order frequency response in Y cells in some ways resembled that of X cells. However, the Y first-order response declined to zero at a much lower spatial frequency than in X cells. Furthermore, the second-order frequency response was larger in Y cells; the second-order frequency components became the dominant part of the response for patterns of high spatial frequency. This implies that the receptive field center and surround mechanisms are physiologically quite different in Y cells from those in X cells, and that the Y cells also receive excitatory drive from an additional nonlinear receptive field mechanism.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 490143      PMCID: PMC2228497          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.74.2.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  36 in total

1.  Parallel cone bipolar pathways to a ganglion cell use different rates and amplitudes of quantal excitation.

Authors:  M A Freed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functional circuitry of the retinal ganglion cell's nonlinear receptive field.

Authors:  J B Demb; L Haarsma; M A Freed; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Contrast adaptation in subthreshold and spiking responses of mammalian Y-type retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Kareem A Zaghloul; Kwabena Boahen; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Unusual Physiological Properties of Smooth Monostratified Ganglion Cell Types in Primate Retina.

Authors:  Colleen E Rhoades; Nishal P Shah; Michael B Manookin; Nora Brackbill; Alexandra Kling; Georges Goetz; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Linking lateral interactions in flicker perception to lateral geniculate nucleus cell responses.

Authors:  Vladislav Kozyrev; Luiz Carlos L Silveira; Jan Kremers
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The dynamical response properties of neocortical neurons to temporally modulated noisy inputs in vitro.

Authors:  Harold Köndgen; Caroline Geisler; Stefano Fusi; Xiao-Jing Wang; Hans-Rudolf Lüscher; Michele Giugliano
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Nonlinear signal transmission between second- and third-order neurons of cockroach ocelli.

Authors:  M Mizunami
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Delayed suppression shapes disparity selective responses in monkey V1.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Nonlinear spatial integration in the receptive field surround of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Daisuke Takeshita; Tim Gollisch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The dynamic receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Sophia Wienbar; Gregory W Schwartz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.