Literature DB >> 4899996

Sedative properties of simple analgesics.

J N Hunt, R C Lallemand.   

Abstract

1. An attempt has been made to assess under double blind conditions the sedative action of phenacetin, paracetamol, and aspirin by testing their ability to prolong sleep in the face of a rapidly filling bladder.2. The volume in the bladder on awakening was independent of the rate of urine formation.3. Although phenacetin prolonged sleep there was no corresponding increase in urine volume on awakening. Apparently phenacetin sensitized the bladder to the distending volume and reduced the rate of urine formation. It was unnecessary to postulate sedative action to explain the results.4. Paracetamol had no effect on the mean sleep interval or mean urine volume although the drug was not totally inactive since it increased the variance of the results for sleep interval and urine volume.5. Aspirin prolonged sleep interval, but this effect would be explained if it were an antidiuretic because there was no increase in urine volume on awakening.6. Apparently no sedative or hypnotic has been shown to increase the urine volume on awakening under similar conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1969        PMID: 4899996      PMCID: PMC1703695          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1969.tb10581.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  7 in total

1.  OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT OF SEDATION. I. INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  W NORRIS; H I NISBET
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1963-08       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  A METHOD FOR THE EVALUATION OF HYPNOTICS IN MAN.

Authors:  D JACKSON; P G GOODING
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  A pharmacological investigation of the hypnotic action of a new derivative of chloral hydrate, chlorhexadol.

Authors:  G A CONDOURIS; D D BONNYCASTLE
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 2.378

4.  A study of hypnotics in normal subjects with induced awakening.

Authors:  G A CONDOURIS; P J COSTA; D D BONNYCASTLE
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1960 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  A method for evaluation of hypnotic drugs.

Authors:  B ISAACS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1957-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  MEASUREMENT OF THE EFFECT ON THE PAIN THRESHOLD OF ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID, ACETANILID, ACETOPHENETIDIN, AMINOPYRINE, ETHYL ALCOHOL, TRICHLORETHYLENE, A BARBITURATE, QUININE, ERGOTAMINE TARTRATE AND CAFFEINE: AN ANALYSIS OF THEIR RELATION TO THE PAIN EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  H G Wolff; J D Hardy; H Goodell
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1941-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  A comparison of acetophenetidin and acetaminophen. II. Subjective effects in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  N R Eade; L Lasagna
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 4.030

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.