Literature DB >> 487887

The role of frames of reference in the development of responsiveness to shading information.

A Yonas, M Kuskowski, S Sternfels.   

Abstract

The use of frames of reference in interpreting shading information in pictures was studied with children from 3 to 8 years of age. After learning to discriminate tactually between a convexity and a concavity, the subjects were presented a photograph of the convexity and the concavity in which the only information for differential shape was provided by the relationship between the orientation of the shading on the shapes and the frames of reference. By changing the position of the subject's head, rotating the display, and changing the location of the source of illumination, the relevance of egocentric, environmental, and lighting-specified frames of reference was manipulated. Children in this age range were found to be sensitive to shading information for depth, both when that information was specified by only a single frame of reference and when all three frames of reference were relevant. Differences in the responsiveness to individual frames of reference were found: the egocentric (head-retina) frame of reference was most effective, followed by the environmental reference frame, and finally by the frame of reference based on the location of the light source in the space surrounding the photograph. Responsiveness to the environmental and lighting-based frames of reference increased with age, while responsiveness to the egocentric frame of reference was high for all age groups and did not increase with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 487887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  10 in total

1.  On the perception of shape from shading.

Authors:  D A Kleffner; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-07

2.  The development of the ability of infants to utilize static cues to create and access representations of object shape.

Authors:  Aki Tsuruhara; Tadamasa Sawada; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Sherryse Corrow; Albert Yonas
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The human visual system's assumption that light comes from above is weak.

Authors:  Yaniv Morgenstern; Richard F Murray; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Infants' sensitivity to the depth cue of shading.

Authors:  C E Granrud; A Yonas; E A Opland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-05

5.  Development of context dependency in human space perception.

Authors:  Alessandra Sciutti; David Burr; Alice Saracco; Giulio Sandini; Monica Gori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Factors that determine depth perception of trapezoids, windsurfers, runways.

Authors:  Chia-Huei Tseng; Joetta L Gobell; George Sperling
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The perception of shape from shading in a new light.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Reference Frames and 3-D Shape Perception of Pictured Objects: On Verticality and Viewpoint-From-Above.

Authors:  Els V K Cornelis; Andrea J van Doorn; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-06-29

9.  Gravity-dependent change in the 'light-from-above' prior.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assumed Lighting Direction in the Interpretation of Cast Shadows.

Authors:  Tomomi Koizumi; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga; Masaki Ogawa; Erika Tomimatsu
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-07-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.