Literature DB >> 4873840

The role of afferent lymphatics in the rejection of skin homografts.

C F Barker, R E Billingham.   

Abstract

Experiments have been carried out on guinea pigs of two isogenic strains to elucidate the role of afferent lymphatic vessels in the rejection of orthotopic skin homografts. Graft beds were prepared in partially isolated skin flaps with an intact sustaining vascular "umbilical cord" in which a lymphatic connection with the host could be retained or abolished at will. In the absence of demonstrable lymphatic connections between flap and host, intra-flap homografts long outlived similar grafts transplanted to conventional sites in intact skin and, rather than being specifically rejected, died as a consequence of ischemic necrosis of the flap. When lymphatic drainage was retained, intra-flap homografts were rejected in the usual manner. Hosts of long-term intra-flap homografts did not develop sensitivity, as evidenced by the "first set" type rejection of subsequent test grafts, or by the long-term survival of a second skin graft transplanted to a new flap raised on the opposite side of the host's body. Intra-flap skin homografts were rejected if (a) the hosts had been presensitized, (b) they were grafted concomitantly with a skin homograft placed in a conventional site, or inoculated with a suspension of donor lymphoid cells, or (c) if the lymphatic drainage was restored by reimplantation of the hitherto partially isolated flap to an appropriate vascular bed. These findings and others indicate that an intact lymphatic drainage in its bed is essential for an orthotopic skin homograft to sensitize its host. Various experiments were carried out in which intra-flap homografts were used as "indicators" for the acquisition of specific active or adoptive immunity by their hosts. By transplanting skin homografts to conventional beds concomitantly with intra-flap grafts and then excising the former at various intervals, it has been found that a graft must be in residence for a minimum period of 4 days to evoke the development of a detectable level of sensitivity in the host. Furthermore, by replacing either freshly prepared or long-term skin flaps bearing skin homografts in vascular beds on the trunk and determining the subsequent survival times of the homografts, evidence has been obtained suggesting that reestablishment of a functional lymphatic system in a free skin graft may take as long as 9 days. Using intra-flap homografts as indicators of adoptive immunization of the host, we found that as few as 50 x 10(6) isologous peripheral blood leukocytes from a specifically sensitized animal will transfer an effective level of sensitivity. We also found that hyperimmune serum, in relatively large amount, exerts a weak but definite adverse effect upon either freshly or recently transplanted intra-flap grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1968        PMID: 4873840      PMCID: PMC2138504          DOI: 10.1084/jem.128.1.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  24 in total

1.  ANALYSIS OF MECHANISM OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS IN RENAL HOMOTRANSPLANTATION.

Authors:  J E MURRAY; A G SHEIL; R MOSELEY; P KNIGHT; J D MCGAVIC; G J DAMMIN
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Time and dose relationships in the development of immunity to skin homografts in mice.

Authors:  L HENRY; G J DAMMIN
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Time of onset and duration of transplantation immunity.

Authors:  R E BILLINGHAM; L BRENT; J B BROWN; P B MEDAWAR
Journal:  Transplant Bull       Date:  1959-10

4.  The melanocytes of mammals.

Authors:  R E BILLINGHAM; W K SILVERS
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1960-03       Impact factor: 4.875

5.  Cellular and humoral factors in the immunity to skin homografts: experiments with a porous membrane.

Authors:  M F WOODRUFF
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1957-03-22       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Transplantation Immunity: Some Properties of Induction and Expression.

Authors:  C F McKhann; J H Berrian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A method for rapid graphic solution of time-per cent effect curves.

Authors:  J T LITCHFIELD
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  A functional and morphologic study of intracranial thyroid allografts in the dog.

Authors:  E M Lance
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1967-09

9.  The influence of extracorporeal irradiation of the blood and lymph on skin homograft rejection.

Authors:  A D Chanana; G Brecher; E P Cronkite; D Joel; H Schnappauf
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  THE ROLE OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE SENSITIZATION OF RATS TO RENAL HOMOGRAFTS.

Authors:  S STROBER; J L GOWANS
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1965-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  69 in total

Review 1.  Transplantation tolerance from a historical perspective.

Authors:  T E Starzl; R M Zinkernagel
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 2.  The immunologic properties of epidermal Langerhans cells as a part of the dendritic cell system.

Authors:  N Romani; G Schuler
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1992

3.  HA-ving lymphatics improves lung transplantation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Maltzman; Hasina Outtz Reed; Mark L Kahn
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Back to the future.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The mystique of organ transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  The unfinished legacy of liver transplantation: emphasis on immunology.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl; Fadi G Lakkis
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Acquired immunologic tolerance: with particular reference to transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.829

8.  Cutting edge: Acute lung allograft rejection is independent of secondary lymphoid organs.

Authors:  Andrew E Gelman; Wenjun Li; Steven B Richardson; Bernd H Zinselmeyer; Jiaming Lai; Mikio Okazaki; Christopher G Kornfeld; Friederike H Kreisel; Seiichiro Sugimoto; Jeremy R Tietjens; John Dempster; G Alexander Patterson; Alexander S Krupnick; Mark J Miller; Daniel Kreisel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Lymph flow and changes in intracellular enzymes during healing and rejection of rabbit skin grafts.

Authors:  M K Jasani; G P Lewis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Donor exosomes rather than passenger leukocytes initiate alloreactive T cell responses after transplantation.

Authors:  Jose Marino; Mohamed H Babiker-Mohamed; Patrick Crosby-Bertorini; Joshua T Paster; Christian LeGuern; Sharon Germana; Reza Abdi; Mayuko Uehara; James I Kim; James F Markmann; Georges Tocco; Gilles Benichou
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2016-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.