Literature DB >> 486434

Bacteriorhodopsin in liposomes. II. Experimental evidence in support of a theoretical model.

K J Hellingwerf, J C Arents, B J Scholte, H V Westerhoff.   

Abstract

In the preceding article equations describing relevant ion flows in illuminated suspensions of bacteriorhodopsin liposomes have been derived. Here these equations are subjected to experimental tests. Changes in permeability characteristics of the liposomal membrane are brought about by addition of specific ionophores and change of medium composition. Using light-driven proton uptake and electrochemical potential differences for protons across the membrane as observation parameters, ridig attempts to falsify the derived equations are unsuccessful. Agreement between equations and experimental results is established on the point of: (i) the antagonistic effect of valinomycin and nigericin on the two components of the proton-motive force, (ii) the time dependence of the changes in transmembrane electrical and chemical potential differences after the onset of illumination. In three independent experimental systems evidence was obtained for the correctness of the postulated dependence of the turnover rate of the photochemical cycle on back pressure by the transmembrane electrochemical potential difference for protons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 486434     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(79)90034-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  12 in total

Review 1.  Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  J B Russell; H J Strobel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Potential applications of bacteriorhodopsin mutants.

Authors:  P Saeedi; J Mohammadian Moosaabadi; S Sina Sebtahmadi; J Fallah Mehrabadi; M Behmanesh; S Mekhilef
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.269

3.  Electrogenic proton-pumping capabilities of the m-fast and m-slow photocycles of bacteriorhodopsin.

Authors:  Richard W Hendler; Curtis W Meuse
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Functional reconstitution of photosystem I reaction center from cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp PCC6803 into liposomes using a new reconstitution procedure.

Authors:  J Cladera; J L Rigaud; H Bottin; M Duñach
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  23Na-nuclear magnetic resonance study of ionophore-mediated cation exchange between two populations of liposomes.

Authors:  A R Waldeck; P W Kuchel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Mosaic nonequilibrium thermodynamics describes biological energy transduction.

Authors:  H V Westerhoff; K J Hellingwerf; J C Arents; B J Scholte; K Van Dam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles. II. Light-induced proton translocation.

Authors:  K J Hellingwerf
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  Energy coupling of facilitated transport of inorganic ions in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

Authors:  K J Hellingwerf; I Friedberg; J S Lolkema; P A Michels; W N Konings
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  THe proton-per-electron stoicheiometry of 'site 1' of oxidative phosphorylation at high protonmotive force is close to 1.5.

Authors:  P C de Jonge; H V Westerhoff
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1982-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Coupling between the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle and the protonmotive force in Halobacterium halobium cell envelope vesicles. III. Time-resolved increase in the transmembrane electric potential and modeling of the associated ion fluxes.

Authors:  S L Helgerson; M K Mathew; D B Bivin; P K Wolber; E Heinz; W Stoeckenius
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.