Literature DB >> 484755

Presence of observers at patient-practitioner interactions: impact on coordination of care and methodologic implications.

B Starfield, D Steinwachs, I Morris, G Bause, S Siebert, C Westin.   

Abstract

In this study in an urban practice, the presence of a neutral observer at follow-up visits enhanced the extent to which practitioners recognized problems which patients had in a previous visit. This improvement was limited to those problems which initially had been mentioned by patients as requiring follow-up. Follow-up of problems initially mentioned by practitioners as needing follow-up was not improved by the observer unless the problem was also mentioned by the patient. Investigators whose information about practitioner-patient interaction depends upon the presence of an observer should be aware of this and possibly other effects. Although routine involvement of a neutral observer in patient-practitioner interactions is probably undesirable, selected deployment of observers or similar alternatives may be useful in situations where practitioner-patient communication is inadequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 484755      PMCID: PMC1619158          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.69.10.1021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Information factors affecting problem follow-up in ambulatory care.

Authors:  D W Simborg; B H Starfield; S D Horn; S A Yourtee
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Continuity and coordination in primary care: their achievement and utility.

Authors:  B H Starfield; D W Simborg; S D Horn; S A Yourtee
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Practical implications of doctor-patient interaction analysis for pediatric practice.

Authors:  B M Korsch; B Freemon; V F Negrete
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1971-02

4.  Coordination of care and its relationship to continuity and medical records.

Authors:  B Starfield; D Simborg; C Johns; S Horn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Doctor-patient communication and outcomes among diabetic patients.

Authors:  B S Hulka; L L Kupper; J C Cassel; F Mayo
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1975

6.  Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications.

Authors:  B S Hulka; J C Cassel; L L Kupper; J A Burdette
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study.

Authors:  John W Beasley; Terry H Hankey; Rodney Erickson; Kurt C Stange; Marlon Mundt; Marguerite Elliott; Pamela Wiesen; James Bobula
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Concordance of the ambulatory medical record and patients' recollections of aspects of an ambulatory new-patient visit.

Authors:  J W Ramsdell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Hawthorne effect in direct observation research with physicians and patients.

Authors:  Meredith A Goodwin; Kurt C Stange; Stephen J Zyzanski; Benjamin F Crabtree; Elaine A Borawski; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  What do patients bring up in consultations? An observational study in general practice.

Authors:  Elisabeth Bjørland; Mette Brekke
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.581

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.