Literature DB >> 48449

Hoechst 33258 fluorescent staining of Drosophila chromosomes.

G Holmquist.   

Abstract

Metaphase chromosomes of D. melanogaster, D. virilis and D. eopydei were sequentilly stained with quinacrine, 33258 Hoechst and Giemsa and photographed after each step. Hoechst stained chromosomes fluoresced much brighter and with different banding patterns than quinacrine stained ones. In contrast to mammalian chromosomes, Drosophia's quinacrine and Hoechst bright bands are all in centric heterochromatin and the banding patterns seem more taxonomically divergent than external morphological characteristics. Hoechst stained D. melanogaster chromosomes show unprecedented longitudinal differentiation by the heterochromatic regions; each arm of each autosome can be unambiguously identified and the Y shows eleven bright bands. The Hoechst stained Y can also be identified in polytene chromocenters. Centric alpha heterochromatin of each D. virilis autosome is composed of two blocks which can be differtiated by a combination of quinacrine and Hoechst staining. The distal block is always Q-H- while the proximal block is, for the various autosomes, either Q-H-, Q+H- or Q+H+. With these permutations of Hoechst and quinacrine staining, D. virilis autosomes can be unambiguously distinguished. The X and two autosomes have H+ heterochromatin which can easily be seen in polytene and interphase nuclei where it seems to aggregate and exclude H- heterochromatin. This affinity of fluorochrome similar heterochromatin was been seen in colcemide induced multiple somatic non-disjunctions where H+ chromosomes were distributed to one rosette and H- chromosomes were distributed to another. Knowing the base composition and base sequences of Drosophila satellites, we conclude that AT richness may be necessary but is certainly an insufficient requirement for quinacrine bright chromatin while GC richness may be a sufficient requirement for the absence of quinacrine or Hoechst brightness. Condensed euchromatin is almost as bright as Q+ heterochromatin. While chromatin condensation has little effect on Hoechst staining, it appears to be "the most important factor responsible for quinacrine brightness.' All existing data from D. virilis indicate that each fluorochrome distinct block of alpha heterochromatin may contain a single a single DNA molecule which is one heptanucleotide repeated two million times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 48449     DOI: 10.1007/bf00285127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  37 in total

Review 1.  DNA of Drosophila chromosomes.

Authors:  C D Laird
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  The fluorescence of quinacrine mustard with nucleic acids.

Authors:  R K Selander; A De la Chapelle
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1973-10-24

3.  Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differences in the quinacrine staining of the chromosomes of a pair of sibling species: Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  J R Ellison; H J Barr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The satellite DNAs of Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  J G Gall; E H Cohen; D D Atherton
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1974

6.  Reptitive DNA sequences in drosophila.

Authors:  J G Gall; E H Cohen; M L Polan
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Chemical differentiation along metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  T Caspersson; S Farber; G E Foley; J Kudynowski; E J Modest; E Simonsson; U Wagh; L Zech
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Repeated sequences in the DNA of Drosophila and their localization in giant chromosomes.

Authors:  W Hennig; I Hennig; H Stein
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1970-12-02       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  One the nature of chromosome-sized DNA molecules.

Authors:  R Kavenoff; L C Klotz; B H Zimm
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1974

10.  Heterochromatin pattern in metaphase chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T C Hsu
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1971 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

View more
  33 in total

1.  Cytogenetic analysis of the second chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P Dimitri
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The organization of DNA in the mitotic and polytene chromosomes of Sciara corprophila.

Authors:  E M Eastman; R M Goodman; B F Erlanger; O J Miller
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  The Genetic and Cytological Organization of the Y Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  J A Kennison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Structure and function of Y chromosomal DNA. I. Sequence organization and localization of four families of repetitive DNA on the Y chromosome of Drosophila hydei.

Authors:  M Wlaschek; A Awgulewitsch; H Bünemann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Genomic organization in the flesh fly Sarcophaga bullata.

Authors:  D Samols; H Swift
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Characterization of extrachromosomal DNA in the flesh fly Sarcophaga bullata.

Authors:  D Samols; H Swift
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Non-random position of the A-T rich DNA sequences in early embryos of Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  J R Ellison; G C Howard
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Immunofluorescent localization of triplex DNA in polytene chromosomes of Chironomus and Drosophila.

Authors:  G D Burkholder; L J Latimer; J S Lee
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Localization of Drosophila nasutoides satellite DNAs in metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  L L Wheeler; F Arrighi; M Cordeiro-Stone; C S Lee
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Mechanisms of chromosome banding. VIII. Hoechst 33258-DNA interaction.

Authors:  D E Comings
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-10-14       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.