Literature DB >> 4835063

Conventional occlusion vs. pleoptics in the treatment of amblyopia.

S Véronneau-Troutman, S S Dayanoff, T Stohler, A C Clahane.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1974        PMID： 4835063     DOI： 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90019-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Preschool hearing, speech, language, and vision screening.

Authors:  J Bamford; A Davis; J Boyle; J Law; S Chapman; S S Brown; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

2.  Stability of visual acuity in amblyopic patients after visual maturity.

Authors:  W E Scott; C F Dickey
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.

Authors:  Aileen Antonio-Santos; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Sarah R Hatt; Christine Powell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-06

4.  Controlled study comparing CAM treatment with occlusion therapy.

Authors:  K G Nyman; G Singh; A Rydberg; M Fornander
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  [Influence of peripheral binocular vision in amblyopia with excentric fixation. Clinical study of patients with papillary fixation].

Authors:  E Stangler-Zuschrott
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-12-30       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 6.  Interventions for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.

Authors:  S Hatt; A Antonio-Santos; C Powell; S S Vedula
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

7.  Electronically monitored occlusion therapy in amblyopia with eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Berna Mehmed; Maria Fronius; Tabea Pohl; Hanns Ackermann; Charlotte Schramm; Bettina Spieth; Christian Hofmann; Thomas Kohnen; Yaroslava Wenner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.117
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.