Literature DB >> 483043

Computed tomographic scanning and the lumbar spine. Part II: Clinical considerations.

C V Burton, K B Heithoff, W Kirkaldy-Willis, C D Ray.   

Abstract

With the advent of computed tomography of the lumbar spine, the theories of a small number of pioneering physicians regarding the pathologic sequela of degenerative disc disease and the entities of central and lateral spinal stenosis have been translated into objective determinations which can now be observed by all. CT scanning has provided clinicians with a better appreciation of the diagnostic limitations of myelography and of the pathologic sequela of hemilaminectomy, dorsal-lateral fusion, and discectomy itself. Since the identification by CT scanning of the loss of disc volume, leading to lateral nerve entrapment and nerve compression resulting from fusion overgrowth, it has become clear that our present modes of therapy require comprehensive reevaluation. Because of the findings of CT scanning, dorsal-lateral fusion now appears to have a much reduced role in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis. In an era in which unnecessary surgery is a matter of concern, CT scanning is an important means of ensuring that surgery will be undertaken only after thorough pathologic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 483043     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-197907000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of myelography and computer tomography in lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  J Zsernaviczky; M Juppe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Anatomy of the lumbar radicular canal.

Authors:  J M Vital; B Lavignolle; N Grenier; F Rouais; R Malgat; J Senegas
Journal:  Anat Clin       Date:  1983

3.  CT scanning versus myelography in the diagnosis of lumbar stenosis. A preliminary report.

Authors:  F Postacchini; G Pezzeri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.