Literature DB >> 482882

An attempted integration of information relevant to schizophrenic subtypes.

W T Carpenter, J H Stephens.   

Abstract

The usefulness and validity of traditional subtypes are questionable. The subtypes described in earlier years no longer emerge with the clarity previously described. The four classical subtypes cannot be reliably distinguished and have not been shown to have predictive validity. Subtypes classified along course or prognostic lines may be more clinically useful. Attempts to subdivide schizophrenia along biologic and genetic lines offer promise. Recent efforts to describe new subdivisions of schizophrenia are readily justified, but new descriptive subtypes are likely to prove useful only when validated by biological, genetic, treatment response, and outcome data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 482882     DOI: 10.1093/schbul/5.3.490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  6 in total

1.  Cognitive profiles in persons with chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sharron E Dawes; Dilip V Jeste; Barton W Palmer
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  Characterization of the deficit syndrome in drug-naive schizophrenia patients: the role of spontaneous movement disorders and neurological soft signs.

Authors:  Victor Peralta; Lucía Moreno-Izco; Ana Sanchez-Torres; Elena García de Jalón; Maria S Campos; Manuel J Cuesta
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Lack of use in the literature from the last 20 years supports dropping traditional schizophrenia subtypes from DSM-5 and ICD-11.

Authors:  David L Braff; James Ryan; Anthony J Rissling; William T Carpenter
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Characterizing trajectories of cognitive functioning in older adults with schizophrenia: does method matter?

Authors:  Wesley K Thompson; Gauri N Savla; Ipsit V Vahia; Colin A Depp; Ruth O'Hara; Dilip V Jeste; Barton W Palmer
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Neural models of schizophrenia.

Authors:  S Heckers
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.986

6.  Individual differences in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls; Wenlian Lu; Lin Wan; Hao Yan; Chuanyue Wang; Fude Yang; Yunlong Tan; Lingjiang Li; Hao Yu; Peter F Liddle; Lena Palaniyappan; Dai Zhang; Weihua Yue; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2017-11-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.