Literature DB >> 4826480

Current status of biomedical book reviewing. II. Time lag in biomedical book reviewing.

C C Chen.   

Abstract

This part of the study explores the effectiveness of the review media in terms of speed of reviewing, comprehensiveness of review treatment, and authority. The time lags for the fifty-four journals varied widely, the mean ranging from 5.8 months to forty-two months. The time lags for all 3,347 reviews varied even more widely, ranging from less than a month to 108 months after a book was off the press. The 3,347 reviews had a mean time lag of 10.43 months and a standard deviation of 6.63 months.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4826480      PMCID: PMC198771     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  1 in total

1.  An Evaluation of Medical Book Reviews.

Authors:  J E Wilson
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1945-07
  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  How to write a scholarly book review for publication in a peer-reviewed journal: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexander D Lee; Bart N Green; Claire D Johnson; Julie Nyquist
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part III. Duplication patterns in biomedical book reviewing.

Authors:  C C Chen
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1974-07

3.  Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part IV. Major American and British biomedical book publishers.

Authors:  C C Chen
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1974-07

4.  Book reviews in medical journals.

Authors:  K Kroenke
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1986-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.