Literature DB >> 481357

Calculating dose from remaining body activity: a comparison of two methods.

J L Coffey, E E Watson.   

Abstract

Two methods for calculating the radiation dose from remaining body activity have been suggested. One requires correction of the cumulated activities so that they reflect the activity uniformly distributed in the total body. The other method requires correction of the S values so that a value of S for the target organ from the remainder of the body is obtained. These two methods give the same answer. We have examined these methods and the number of steps required to calculate the radiation dose in each case. Our results show that the method of correcting the cumulated activities is preferred, especially if the number of source and target organs is large and a computer equipped with the necessary software is not available.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 481357     DOI: 10.1118/1.594586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  3 in total

1.  On an alternative method of estimating effective dose equivalent.

Authors:  T Smith
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

2.  Comparative Dosimetry for 68Ga-DOTATATE: Impact of Using Updated ICRP Phantoms, S Values, and Tissue-Weighting Factors.

Authors:  Anders Josefsson; Robert F Hobbs; Sagar Ranka; Bryan C Schwarz; Donika Plyku; Jose Willegaignon de Amorim de Carvalho; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel; Marcelo Tatit Sapienza; Wesley E Bolch; George Sgouros
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Validation of prospective whole-body bone marrow dosimetry by SPECT/CT multimodality imaging in (131)I-anti-CD20 rituximab radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Jan A Boucek; J Harvey Turner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 9.236

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.