Literature DB >> 47785

An error in Rh testing in pregnancy.

B Chown, J M Bowman, J Pollock.   

Abstract

Anti-D (anti-Rho) in the blood of two Rh-negative pregnant women was believed to be due to active immunization. In the first case, however, antibodies were no longer detectable 2 weeks later. In the second case they disappeared by the end of 31 weeks. It was discovered that both women had been given immune globulin (human) because of exposure to rubella. The globulin given to the first woman probably contained about 0.1 mug of anti-D per ml; that given to the second probably contained about 0.6 mug of anti-D per ml. Both babies were O Rh-positive. Both women were given Rh immune globulin after delivery. Both have completed a further pregnancy and no anti-D has been found on many tests. In tests carried out in 1971 all samples of immune globulin (human) examined contained anti-D, but usually in inconsequential trace amounts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 47785      PMCID: PMC1959080     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  3 in total

1.  Immune serum globulin--a cause for anti-Rh (D) passive sensitization.

Authors:  G E Lang; B Veldhuis
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Red blood cell sensitization due to unexpected Rh antibodies in immune serum globulin.

Authors:  H A Oberman; M L Beck
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1971 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  The effect of anti-D IgG on D-positive recipients.

Authors:  B Chown; J M Bowman; J Pollock; B Lowen; A Pettett
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1970-05-30       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.