Literature DB >> 4750434

Mechanics of sphincter action. Studies on the lower esophageal sphincter.

P Biancani, R K Goyal, A Phillips, H M Spiro.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical factors involved in the genesis of lower esophageal sphincter pressure. We determined the relationship between intraluminal pressure and inside diameter, estimated the ratio between the wall thickness to inside radius, and calculated the tension in the wall of the lower esophageal sphincter as a function of the inside diameter. Various degrees of circumferential stretch were applied by introducing probes of different diameters in the rat lower esophageal sphincter in vivo. The intraluminal pressure produced by the lower esophageal sphincter around each probe was measured and pressure-diameter curves were constructed during (a) resting state, (b) contraction produced by electrical stimulation, and (c) relaxation produced by esophageal distension. The intraluminal pressure at an inside diameter of 0.5 mm was similar to that at inside diameter of 3.2 mm. This was true for the sphincter at rest as well as upon electrical stimulation. The pressure diameter curve, however, was sigmoid in shape; at first it showed a decline and then an increase followed by decline in pressure again with increasing diameters. The ratio of wall thickness to inside radius or the magnification factor varied with inside diameters as expected and this ratio increased steeply at small inside diameters. The tension diameter curves of the sphincter muscle showed that optimal tension development occurred not near sphincter closure but at a much wider diameter of 3.2 mm and that this muscle developed tension even at small luminal diameters. This behavior of the sphincter muscle ensures effective intraluminal pressure over a wide range of luminal diameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4750434      PMCID: PMC302570          DOI: 10.1172/JCI107494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  13 in total

1.  On the physical equilibrium of small blood vessels.

Authors:  A C BURTON
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1951-02

2.  Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation: studies on the neurogenic inhibitory mechanism.

Authors:  A Tuch; S Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Physiological determinants of lower esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  W Lipshutz; S Cohen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Amplitude of esophageal peristalsis as determined by rapid infusion.

Authors:  J B Hollis; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Mechanical properties of the esophageal wall.

Authors:  R K Goyal; P Biancani; A Phillips; H M Spiro
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Electrical stimulation of esophageal smooth muscle and effects of antagonists.

Authors:  G F Lund; J Christensen
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1969-11

7.  Correlation of several methods for recording esophageal sphincteral pressures.

Authors:  J A Rinaldo; J F Levey
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1968-10

8.  Effect of infusion on force of closure measurements in the human esophagus.

Authors:  C E Pope
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Force-velocity characteristics of respiratory airway smooth muscle.

Authors:  N L Stephens; E Kroeger; J A Mehta
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.531

10.  Quantitation of lower esophageal sphincter competence.

Authors:  C S Winans; L D Harris
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  10 in total

1.  Pressure tension, and force of closure of the human lower esophageal sphincter and esophagus.

Authors:  P Biancani; M P Zabinski; J Behar
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; W N Miller
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1976-01

3.  The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording.

Authors:  S B Lydon; W J Dodds; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-10

Review 4.  Physiology of normal esophageal motility.

Authors:  Raj K Goyal; Arun Chaudhury
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Measurement of pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter. The influence of catheter diameter.

Authors:  M D Kaye; J P Showalter
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1974-09

6.  Location of the lower oesophageal sphincter and the squamous columnar mucosal junction in 109 healthy controls and 778 patients with different degrees of endoscopic oesophagitis.

Authors:  A Csendes; F Maluenda; I Braghetto; P Csendes; A Henriquez; M S Quesada
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Rheological properties of the dog pyloric sphincter.

Authors:  P Arhan; B Persoz; P Gignier; R Lemoine; M Hero; D Pellerin; P Gallix; B L'Hopital; C Faverdin; G Devroede
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Is gastrin a major determinant of basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure? A double-blind controlled study using high titer gastrin antiserum.

Authors:  R K Goyal; J E McGuigan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Compliance measurement of lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal body in achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  A D Jenkinson; S M Scott; E Yazaki; G Fusai; S M Walker; S S Kadirkamanathan; D F Evans
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Gestational and postnatal modulation of esophageal sphincter reflexes in human premature neonates.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Theresa R Shubert; Manish B Malkar; Swetha Sitaram; Rebecca K Moore; Lai Wei; Soledad Fernandez; Robert G Castile
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.756

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.