Literature DB >> 4711902

Effects of population size and selection intensity on correlated responses to selection for postweaning gain in mice.

E J Eisen, J P Hanrahan, J E Legates.   

Abstract

Correlated responses to selection for postweaning gain in mice were studied to determine the influence of population size and selection intensity. Correlated traits measured were three-, six- and eight-week body weights, litter size, twelve-day litter weight, proportion infertile matings and two indexes of reproductive performance. In general, the results agreed with observations made on direct response: correlated responses in the body weight traits and litter size increased as (1) selection intensity increased and (2) effective population size increased. Correlated responses in the body weight traits and litter size were positive in the large population size lines (16 pairs), as expected from the positive genetic correlation between these traits and postweaning gain. However, several negative correlated responses were observed at small population sizes (one and two pairs). Within each level of selection intensity, traits generally associated with fitness tended to decline most in the very small populations (one and two pairs) and in the large populations (16 pairs) for apparently different reasons. The fitness decline at the small effective population sizes was attributable to inbreeding depression. In contrast, it was postulated that the fitness decline at the large effective population size was due to selection moving the population mean for body weight and a trait positively correlated genetically with body weight (i.e., percent body fat) away from an optimum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4711902      PMCID: PMC1212932     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  10 in total

1.  MASS SELECTION FOR POST-WEANING GROWTH IN MICE.

Authors:  G W RAHNEFELD; W J BOYLAN; R E COMSTOCK; M SINGH
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Conflict between directional and centripetal selection.

Authors:  J W JAMES
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Selection for long and short wing length in Drosophila melanogaster with different systems of mating.

Authors:  A O TANTAWY
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1956       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Selection for Small and Large Body Size in the House Mouse.

Authors:  J W Macarthur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic Correlation between Growth Rate and Litter Size in Mice.

Authors:  G W Rahnefeld; R E Comstock; M Singh; S R Napuket
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Cellular response to selection for rapid growth in mice.

Authors:  D W Robinson; G E Bradford
Journal:  Growth       Date:  1969-09

7.  Comparisons of ad libitum and restricted feeding of mice selected and unselected for postweaning gain. I. Growth, feed consumption and feed efficiency.

Authors:  V M Timon; E J Eisen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. I. Short-term response to selection.

Authors:  R Frankham; L P Jones; J S Barker
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  An analysis of short-term selection experiments.

Authors:  R H Richardson; K Kojima; H L Lucas
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. II. The genetic nature of the limits.

Authors:  R C Roberts
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Population size and selection intensity effects on long-term selection response in mice.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Selection for egg production on part records : Part 2. Correlated response to selection.

Authors:  V Ayyagari; S C Mohapatra; A Venkatramaiah; D Choudhuri; T Thiagasundaram; D C Johri; P Renganathan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Influence of early pregnancy on reproductive rate in lines of mice selected for litter size.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Selection response for part period egg number and egg mass in chickens - a comparison.

Authors:  A Venkatramaiah; S C Mohapatra; R Sinha; V Ayyagari; D Choudhuri
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 5.  Relationships between quantitative and reproductive fitness traits in animals.

Authors:  Lutz Bünger; Ronald M Lewis; Max F Rothschild; Agustin Blasco; Ulla Renne; Geoff Simm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Ethanol Conditioned Taste Aversion in High Drinking in the Dark Mice.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Antonia M Savarese; Angela R Ozburn; Jason P Schlumbohm; Stephanie E Spence; Wyatt R Hack
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.