Literature DB >> 467462

Differences in surface morphology of microtubules reconstituted from pure brain tubulin using two different microtubule-associated proteins: the high molecular weight MAP 2 proteins and tau proteins.

H P Zingsheim, W Herzog, K Weber.   

Abstract

Microtubules were reconstituted from homogeneous brain tubulin and homogeneous preparations of two different microtubule associated proteins, the high molecular weight MAP 2 proteins or the tau proteins. The resulting microtubules were characterized by three electron microscopical procedures: Thin sectional analysis of embeded material, negative staining analysis using a STEM microscope and high resolution metal-shadowing analysis. By all three procedures MAP 2 microtubules have a much rougher surface morphology than tau microtubules, in agreement with the much higher molecular weight of the MAP 2 proteins. Tau microtubules, however, do not show the very smooth surface of microtubules assembled from pure tubulin in the absence of any microtubule associated proteins. In the case of MAP 2 microtubules thin sectional analysis as well as metal shadowing reveals that the globular protrusions seen in negative staining analysis appear as linear side arms which may extend by as much as 30 nm on both sides from the microtubular wall proper, giving rise to an overall structure with a diameter close to 100 nm. The possible implication of such structures for in vivo situations is briefly discussed as is the possibility that the "halo-effect" around microtubules seen in vivo may be due to a structural organization similar to that of MAP 2 tubules in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 467462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0171-9335            Impact factor:   4.492


  18 in total

1.  Differential vulnerability of microtubule components in cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  T Yanagihara; J M Brengman; W E Mushynski
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.088

2.  Comparison of the effects of microtubule-associated protein 2 and tau on the packing density of in vitro assembled microtubules.

Authors:  M M Black
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Erythrocyte protein 4.1 associates with tubulin.

Authors:  I Correas; J Avila
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  High molecular weight polypeptides (270,000-340,000) from cultured cells are related to hog brain microtubule-associated proteins but copurify with intermediate filaments.

Authors:  R Pytela; G Wiche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Generation of microtubule stability subclasses by microtubule-associated proteins: implications for the microtubule "dynamic instability" model.

Authors:  D Job; M Pabion; R L Margolis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Low molecular weight microtubule-associated proteins are light chains of microtubule-associated protein 1 (MAP 1).

Authors:  R B Vallee; S E Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Microtubule-associated protein 2: monoclonal antibodies demonstrate the selective incorporation of certain epitopes into Alzheimer neurofibrillary tangles.

Authors:  K S Kosik; L K Duffy; M M Dowling; C Abraham; A McCluskey; D J Selkoe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Microtubule-associated proteins: subunits of the cytomatrix.

Authors:  R B Vallee; G S Bloom; W E Theurkauf
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Expression of multiple tau isoforms and microtubule bundle formation in fibroblasts transfected with a single tau cDNA.

Authors:  Y Kanai; R Takemura; T Oshima; H Mori; Y Ihara; M Yanagisawa; T Masaki; N Hirokawa
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Different forms of microtubule-associated protein 2 are encoded by separate mRNA transcripts.

Authors:  C C Garner; A Matus
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.