| Literature DB >> 467415 |
M Ariyoshi, K Yamaji, R J Shephard.
Abstract
Three possible patterns of pacing (type 1, fast/slow; type 2, slow/fast; and type 3, steady rate) were compared over a 1400 m, 4 min run. The subsequent running time to exhaustion at 370 m . min-1 was significantly longer with a type 1 than with a type 2 protocol (P less than 0.05). The steady rate pattern gave results intermediate between type 1 and type 2 pacing. Data for oxygen debt and recovery heart rate confirmed the superiority of type 1 pacing. Possible explanations included (1) a reduction of inefficient anaerobic work, and (2) a greater mechanical efficiency associated with the better matching of required effort to a tapering physiological power. Runners should aim at a steady physiological rather than a steady physical load.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1979 PMID: 467415 DOI: 10.1007/bf00421655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol ISSN: 0301-5548