Literature DB >> 4654257

Receptive field organization of 'sustained' and 'transient' retinal ganglion cells which subserve different function roles.

H Ikeda, M J Wright.   

Abstract

1. Post-stimulus histograms were obtained from ;sustained' and ;transient' retinal ganglion cells for receptive field plots using a light spot with square-wave modulation of intensity, and of variable intensity and area. Fundamental differences in their receptive field organization in time and space were revealed.2. In ;sustained' cells, excitation consists of ;transient' and ;sustained' components and the ratio of transient/sustained components remains constant at a given retinal locus for a wide range of intensities. The transient component becomes proportionally larger towards the periphery of the receptive field. This rule is also applicable for the inhibitory and disinhibitory surround. In ;transient' cells, however, there is no true ;sustained' component, but some cells produce a double peaked transient post-stimulus histogram at the R.F. centre when high flux stimuli are used, while others show a single peak transient response. The magnitude and shape of transient responses changes with intensity as well as with location in the receptive field.3. The sensitivity gradients of ;sustained' and ;transient' cells show consistent differences in shape. The mean slope of the sensitivity gradients of a sample of ;sustained' cells was 10 times that of a sample of ;transient' cells. The sensitivity gradient of ;sustained' cells shows a distinct surround region where the inhibitory mechanism is more sensitive, while that of ;transient' cells usually does not, owing to an extensive ;tail' on the sensitivity gradient of the centre mechanism, which overlaps the surround.4. Ricco's Law also holds for the centre mechanism of ;transient' cells. Non-linear summation occurs at supra-threshold levels, and when the surround mechanisms are involved.5. Supra-optimal stimuli give a saturation of the response in both ;transient and ;sustained' cells. This saturation is associated with a decrease of latency in ;transient' cells, but not in ;sustained' cells.6. The latency of retinal ganglion cells is determined by both stimulus and background flux. The effect of the background is negligible except at low values of stimulus flux, where its effect may be analysed primarily in terms of its effect on the incremental threshold.7. The latency to stimulation with a standard small spot (25-27') at the receptive field centre is shorter for ;sustained' cells than for ;transient' cells; this latency difference being related to the greater sensitivity of the ;sustained' cells to stimuli of this size. Differences in conduction time along ;transient' and ;sustained' pathways to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and cortex were estimated, and it is concluded that despite the latency difference noted above, a response to a stimulus which is optimal for a ;transient' cell reaches the cortex faster than the response to a stimulus which is optimal for a ;sustained' cell.8. The above results together with previous evidence available suggest that for most stimuli, centre and surround mechanisms are activated simultaneously and algebraically summed by a single linear stage in ;sustained' cells. In ;transient' cells, although the centre excitation and surround inhibition pools are also spatially co-extensive, they summate and interact in time and space with a greater complexity.9. Differences in the receptive field organization of ;sustained' and ;transient' cells may reflect their different functional roles in vision: (1) analysis of spatial contrast and form recognition (;sustained' cells), and (2) fast detection of objects entering visual space to cause orientation responses (;transient' cells).

Mesh:

Year:  1972        PMID: 4654257      PMCID: PMC1331286          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  23 in total

1.  Activation of lateral geniculate neurons by electrical stimulation of superior colliculus in cats.

Authors:  Y Hayashi; I Sumitomo; K Iwama
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1967-12-15

2.  Quantitative aspects of sensitivity and summation in the cat retina.

Authors:  B G Cleland; C Enroth-cugell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief flashes of light.

Authors:  W R Levick; J L Zacks
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Quantitative aspects of gain and latency in the cat retina.

Authors:  B G Cleland; C Enroth-Cugell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Two visual systems.

Authors:  G E Schneider
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The inner plexiform layer of the vertebrate retina: a quantitative and comparative electron microscopic analysis.

Authors:  M W Dubin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Cat retinal ganglion cell dendritic fields.

Authors:  J E Brown; D Major
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli.

Authors:  R W Rodieck
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Temporal characteristics of responses to photic stimulation by single ganglion cells in the unopened eye of the cat.

Authors:  T Ogawa; P O Bishop; W R Levick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Organization of retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. I. Synaptic structure.

Authors:  J E Dowling; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  66 in total

1.  Responses of single units in the monkey superior colliculus to stationary flashing stimuli.

Authors:  J Moors; A J Vendrik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Discharges of relay cells in lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat during spontaneous eye movements in light and darkness.

Authors:  H Noda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Pattern and flicker detection analysed by subthreshold summation.

Authors:  P E King-Smith; J J Kulikowski
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Spontaneously active cells in the abdominal and parietal ganglia of the giant snail Archachatina.

Authors:  R H Nisbet; J M Plummer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Receptive fields and response properties of neurons in layer 4 of ferret visual cortex.

Authors:  W Martin Usrey; Michael P Sceniak; Barbara Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Receptive field mechanisms of sustained and transient retinal ganglion cells in the cat.

Authors:  P Hammond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1975-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of area and intensity on the response of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief light flashes.

Authors:  U Büttner; O J Grüsser; E Schwanz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1975-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Classification of cat retinal ganglion cells into X- and Y-cells with a contrast reversal stimulus.

Authors:  D I Hamasaki; V G Sutija
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Non-linear spatial summation in cat retinal ganglion cells at different background levels.

Authors:  R A Linsenmeier; H G Jakiela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Ongoing temporal coding of a stochastic stimulus as a function of intensity: time-intensity trading.

Authors:  Pascal Michelet; Damir Kovacić; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.