Literature DB >> 46345

Patient's assessment of the result of surgery for peptic ulcer.

E L Cay, A E Philip, W P Small, J Neilson, M A Henderson.   

Abstract

The assessment of the result of surgery for peptic ulcer is based on doctor-determined criteria. Failure to distinguish one operation as being better than another may be because these criteria do not include the patient's rating of outcome. A questionnaire based on patients' descriptions of the quality of result has been tested in 63 patients. Preliminary figures show that success in the opinion of the patient does not necessarily mean absence of symptoms, while failure is due more to psychosocial than physical factors. A logical step in the planning of controlled trials is preoperative control of admission to the trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 46345     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92384-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  5 in total

1.  The four basic types of evaluation: clinical reviews, clinical trials, program reviews, and program trials.

Authors:  J H Abramson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Observer variation in assessment of results of surgery for peptic ulceration.

Authors:  R Hall; J C Horrocks; S E Clamp; F T De Dombal
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-04-03

Review 3.  [Prospective controlled clinical trials in surgery. controversial issues in motivation and performance (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Lorenz; H Rohde
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1979-04-01

4.  A biopsychosocial approach to surgical evaluation and outcome.

Authors:  W Katon; A Kleinman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1980-07

5.  Pads and pants for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  D Bainton; J B Blannin; A M Shepherd
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-08-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.