Literature DB >> 4625438

An evaluation of the Celloscope 401 electronic blood cell counter.

T R Lappin, A Lamont, M G Nelson.   

Abstract

For counting erythrocytes the instrument was precise, with a mean coefficient of variation of 1.21%. Erythrocyte counts showed close agreement with results obtained on a Coulter A electronic counter of proven accuracy. When the Celloscope 401 was modified by the manufacturers to eliminate electrical interference from other laboratory equipment, satisfactory precision and accuracy for white cell counting was obtained. Using cetrimide diluent the coefficient of variation was 1.6% but when using saponin/saline diluent the coefficient of variation was 3.5%. For leucocyte counting there was close agreement between duplicate tests performed on the Celloscope 401 and the Coulter S. The instrument was capable of satisfactory precision and accuracy in platelet counting, provided that the sedimentation method was used to obtain a platelet-rich plasma. The best results were obtained if a two-step dilution was carried out with a first dilution in 10% EDTA and a second in 2.5 mM cocaine in water. Using this method the precision study indicated a coefficient of variation of 3.11%. Close agreement was obtained between platelet counts on the Celloscope 401 when compared with the results obtained either by phase-contrast microscopy or using another electronic counter. Allowing for predilution and duplicate counts on each sample, the rate of throughput was approximately 32 samples per hour. Throughout the test period, the instrument remained electronically and mechanically stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 4625438      PMCID: PMC477376          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.25.6.539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  6 in total

1.  Blood cell counting: a comparison of the E.E.L. and Coulter machines.

Authors:  M G NELSON; J CARVILLE
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Evaluation of electronic red blood cell counter.

Authors:  G BRECHER; M SCHNEIDERMAN; G Z WILLIAMS
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1956-12       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Evaluation of the Fisher autocytometer.

Authors:  T R Lappin; A Lamont; M G Nelson
Journal:  Lab Pract       Date:  1970-09

4.  An evaluation of the autoanalyzer SMA-4.

Authors:  T R Lappin; A Lamont; M G Nelson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Platelet counts with the Coulter counter.

Authors:  B S Bull; M A Schneiderman; G Brecher
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  [Temperature variations as a source of error in the automatic counting of leukocytes using the Coulter counter].

Authors:  R Degkwitz; H Selle
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1965-12-01
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Rmax: A systematic approach to evaluate instrument sort performance using center stream catch.

Authors:  Andrew Riddell; Rui Gardner; Alexis Perez-Gonzalez; Telma Lopes; Lola Martinez
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.608

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.