Literature DB >> 4596404

Evolution of an examination: M.R.C.P. (U.K.).

P R Fleming, W G Manderson, M B Matthews, P H Sanderson, J F Stokes.   

Abstract

Recent changes in the structure of the examination for M.R.C.P. (U.K.) have prompted a review of these together with a historical outline of the examinations which preceded it at the Royal Colleges of Physicians of Edinburgh, Glasgow, and London.Part I of the examination continues to fulfil its role as a screen and a slight change in the marking system appears to have improved its discriminating powers still further. The major change in part II is the substitution of a more objective written test in place of the essay papers.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4596404      PMCID: PMC1610728          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5910.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  1 in total

1.  An examination of the final examination in medicine.

Authors:  G M BULL
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1956-08-25       Impact factor: 79.321

  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.

Authors:  R M Harden; M Stevenson; W W Downie; G M Wilson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-02-22

2.  A standardized rubric to evaluate student presentations.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Eric G Sahloff; Gregory E Stone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Documentation Rubric Within Pharmacotherapy Problem-Based Learning Courses.

Authors:  Kristin R Villa; Tracy L Sprunger; Alison M Walton; Tracy J Costello; Alex N Isaacs
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.

Authors:  I C McManus; M Thompson; J Mollon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Implementing statistical equating for MRCP(UK) Parts 1 and 2.

Authors:  I C McManus; Liliana Chis; Ray Fox; Derek Waller; Peter Tang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Exploration of a possible relationship between examiner stringency and personality factors in clinical assessments: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yvonne Finn; Peter Cantillon; Gerard Flaherty
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  "On the same page"? The effect of GP examiner feedback on differences in rating severity in clinical assessments: a pre/post intervention study.

Authors:  Nancy Sturman; Remo Ostini; Wai Yee Wong; Jianzhen Zhang; Michael David
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?

Authors:  Aileen Faherty; Tim Counihan; Thomas Kropmans; Yvonne Finn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Assessment methods and resource requirements for milestone reporting by an emergency medicine clinical competency committee.

Authors:  Nikhil Goyal; Jason Folt; Bradley Jaskulka; Sudhir Baliga; Michelle Slezak; Lonni R Schultz; Phyllis Vallee
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2018-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.