Literature DB >> 4549073

Secretion and electrogenesis of the supporting cell in the olfactory epithelium.

M Okano, S F Takagi.   

Abstract

1. Electrophysiological study disclosed that chloroform and some other odours generate long-lasting positive potentials in the olfactory epithelium of the bullfrog, while electron microscopical study showed that they elicit vigorous protrusion of the distal cytoplasmic portion of the supporting cell containing the secretory granules.2. The secretory process of the supporting cell is as follows: The first detectable indication is the protrusion of the apical portion of the supporting cell (Pls. 3 and 4); the protruded part detaches from its maternal supporting cell (Pl. 7 B), floats as a droplet in the mucus (Pl. 5), and finally the secretory granules inside the droplet disintegrate into the mucus (Pls. 6 and 7 A).3. The secretion was not elicited by the odours which elicit the negative potentials.4. In Cl(-)-free Ringer solution, neither the positive potential nor the protrusion and secretion occurred.5. When 1-2 mM-Ba(2+) in Ringer solution was dripped on the epithelium, both the positive potential and the protrusion and secretion resulted. Subsequent application of chloroform vapour only advanced further disintegration of the secretory granules, but it elicited neither a new protrusion of the granules nor the positive potential.6. In the olfactory epithelium in which the olfactory cells had degenerated but the supporting cells survived, both the positive potential and the protrusion and secretion occurred, but the negative potential did not.7. It is concluded that Cl(-) entry which mainly generates the longlasting positive potential triggers the secretion of the supporting cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4549073      PMCID: PMC1330671          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  32 in total

1.  'On'- and 'Off'-responses of the olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  S F TAKAGI; T SHIBUYA
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1959-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Secretory potentials in the sublingual gland of the cat.

Authors:  A LUNDBERG
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1957-09-17

3.  The mechanism of establishment of secretory potentials in sublingual gland cells.

Authors:  A LUNDBERG
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1957-09-17

4.  Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog.

Authors:  M M MOZELL
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1962-08

5.  Electron microscopic studies on the distal border of the canine olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  M Okano; A F Weber; S P Frommes
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1967-03

6.  [Differentiation and regeneration of sensory cells in the olfactory region].

Authors:  K H Andres
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1965-09

7.  Ultrastructure of mouse olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  D Frisch
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1967-07

8.  The role of sodium and potassium ions in the generation of the electro-olfactogram.

Authors:  S F Takagi; G A Wyse; H Kitamura; K Ito
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Anion permeability of the olfactory receptive membrane.

Authors:  S F Takagi; G A Wyse; T Yajima
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods.

Authors:  J H LUFT
Journal:  J Biophys Biochem Cytol       Date:  1961-02
View more
  16 in total

1.  Ultrastructural evidence for multiple mucous domains in frog olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  B P Menco; A I Farbman
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Human nasal olfactory epithelium as a dynamic marker for CNS therapy development.

Authors:  Rita Sattler; Yoko Ayukawa; Luke Coddington; Akira Sawa; David Block; Richard Chipkin; Jeffrey D Rothstein
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Purinergic receptor antagonists inhibit odorant-induced heat shock protein 25 induction in mouse olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Colleen C Hegg; Mary T Lucero
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 7.452

4.  An immunocytochemical study of the development of the olfactory system in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L., Teleostei).

Authors:  T Honkanen; P Ekström
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1991

Review 5.  Ion channels from chemosensory olfactory neurons.

Authors:  P Labarca; J Bacigalupo
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Olfactory receptor neuronal dendrites become mostly intra-sustentacularly enwrapped upon maturity.

Authors:  Fengyi Liang
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Peptidergic regulation of secretory activity in amphibian olfactory mucosa: immunohistochemistry, neural stimulation, and pharmacology.

Authors:  M L Getchell; J F Bouvet; T E Finger; A Holley; T V Getchell
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Calcium store-mediated signaling in sustentacular cells of the mouse olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Colleen Cosgrove Hegg; Mavis Irwin; Mary T Lucero
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 7.452

9.  Heterotrimeric G protein subunit Gγ13 is critical to olfaction.

Authors:  Feng Li; Samsudeen Ponissery-Saidu; Karen K Yee; Hong Wang; Meng-Ling Chen; Naoko Iguchi; Genhua Zhang; Ping Jiang; Johannes Reisert; Liquan Huang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Odorant stimulation of secretory and neural processes in the salamander olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  M L Getchell; B Zielinski; J A DeSimone; T V Getchell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.