Literature DB >> 4548720

Response patterns of amphibian olfactory bulb neurones to odour stimulation.

J S Kauer.   

Abstract

1. Responses of 199 single olfactory bulb neurones in the frog were observed with odour stimulation.2. To effect control over the concentration, flow rate and time course of the stimulus application, a simple olfactometer was developed and calibrated using a gas chromatograph. The stimulus pulses were monitored by recording the electro-olfactogram from the olfactory mucosa.3. Several categories of unit activity became evident after delivering many odour applications (637). Some odour applications did not cause any change in the spontaneous activity of the unit. This was classified as type N (no response) activity. Some applications caused a suppression of ongoing activity (type S activity). Some applications caused an excitation during the rising concentration phase of the stimulus pulse (type E activity). Three temporal patterns of excitatory responses were seen and these were categorized as subgroups of activity type E.4. Since each response type was seen with about the same frequency regardless of the odour used, this suggested that the temporal patterns of response per se were not coding for odour type.5. When odour concentration was manipulated for a unit showing suppressive (type S) activity at one concentration, then the unit tended to show qualitatively similar suppression at other concentrations as long as they were above threshold.6. When peak concentrations were manipulated for units showing excitatory (type E) activity, the temporal patterns of response could change dramatically. In many cases the units fired after one level of concentration had been reached and were subsequently suppressed with increase in concentration. Such ;concentration tuning' suggested that excitatory temporal patterns, in contrast to suppressive ones, were coding odour concentration information.7. The significance of the changes in temporal response patterns seen here, for experiments examining the relationships between odours using single unit response data, is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4548720      PMCID: PMC1330730          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  9 in total

1.  STUDIES OF THE RELATION BETWEEN THE FROG'S ELECTRO-OLFACTOGRAM (EOG) AND SINGLE UNIT ACTIVITY IN THE OLFACTORY BULB.

Authors:  K B DOEVING
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1964 Jan-Feb

2.  Analysis of the electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  D OTTOSON
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1955

3.  Responses of olfactory bulb neurones to odour stimulation of small nasal areas in the salamander.

Authors:  J S Kauer; D G Moulton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Response patterns of single units in the olfactory bulb of the rat to odor.

Authors:  D F Mathews
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-12-12       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Olfactory coding in olfactory bulb and medial forebrain bundle of normal and castrated male rats.

Authors:  D W Pfaff; E Gregory
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Quantitative stimulation of frog olfactory receptors.

Authors:  R J O'Connell; M M Mozell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Olfactory bulb units: activity correlated with inhalation cycles and odor quality.

Authors:  F Macrides; S L Chorover
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  An electrophysiological study of odour similarities of homologous substances.

Authors:  K B Döving
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Response patterns of single neurons in the tortoise olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb.

Authors:  D F Mathews
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 4.086

  9 in total
  39 in total

1.  Adaptation of the odour-induced response in frog olfactory receptor cells.

Authors:  J Reisert; H R Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Proceedings Correlation between ultrastructure and histochemistry of mammalian intrafusal muscle fibres.

Authors:  R W Banks; D Barker; D W Harker; M J Stacey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Theta oscillation coupled spike latencies yield computational vigour in a mammalian sensory system.

Authors:  Troy W Margrie; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The bilateral bulbar projections of the primary olfactory neurons in the frog.

Authors:  J Leveteau; I Andriason; P Mac Leod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Hartwig Spors; Matt Wachowiak; Lawrence B Cohen; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 7.  The olfactory bulb and central pathways.

Authors:  J W Scott
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1986-03-15

8.  Relationship between afferent and central temporal patterns in the locust olfactory system.

Authors:  M Wehr; G Laurent
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effects of dopamine and fluphenazine on field potential amplitude in the salamander olfactory bulb.

Authors:  M R Gurski; K A Hamilton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Odor coding by modules of coherent mitral/tufted cells in the vertebrate olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Tsai-Wen Chen; Bei-Jung Lin; Detlev Schild
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.