Literature DB >> 453999

Mitral valve replacement: a nine-year follow-up of risks and survivals.

J S Chaffin, W M Daggett.   

Abstract

Experience with mitral valve replacement over a nine-year period is reviewed. Hospital mortality was 8.9%, with an additional late mortality of 18.5% during a mean follow-up period of 4.34 years. Study of the factors influencing the results of valve replacement revealed a direct correlation between long-term survival and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class, as judged preoperatively, as well as left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, cardiac index, type of valve lesion, and presence of associated coronary artery disease. Hospital mortality was 32% (p less than 0.01) for those patients in NYHA Functional Class IV before operation, compared with 3% for Class III patients. Untreated concomitant coronary artery disease was associated with a significantly higher perioperative mortality of 28% (p = 0.002) compared with an 8% mortality in patients with coronary artery disease treated by vein bypass at the time of mitral valve replacement. Patients with normal coronary arteries documented angiographically before operation had a 1% hospital mortality. Seventy-two percent of all patients are still alive at a maximum follow-up of nine years. Eighty-three percent of those survivors who were in Functional Class III or IV before operation are now considered to be in Class I or II. We conclude that patients should undergo mitral valve replacement before the development of the advanced functional stage of valve disease. In addition, coronary arteriograms should be performed on all patients who are more than 40 years old at the time of cardiac catheterization, and revascularization considered at the time of mitral valve replacement for those patients with significant coronary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 453999     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63305-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Coronary arteriography before aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  F L Rosenfeldt
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-08-18

2.  Revascularization alone or combined with suture annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Evaluation by color Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  L S Czer; G Maurer; A F Bolger; M DeRobertis; A Chaux; J M Matloff
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

3.  Nonischemic mitral regurgitation: prognostic value of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Oladipupo Olafiranye; Clare A Hochreiter; Jeffrey S Borer; Phyllis G Supino; Edmund M Herrold; Adam S Budzikowski; Ofek Y Hai; Dany Bouraad; Paul D Kligfield; Leonard N Girardi; Karl H Krieger; O Wayne Isom
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 1.869

4.  Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: an angiographic study.

Authors:  S Leavey; J Galvin; H McCann; D Sugrue
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  An excellent result of surgical treatment in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension following mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Xiaochun Song; Cui Zhang; Xin Chen; Yongming Chen; Qiankun Shi; Yongsheng Niu; Jilai Xiao; Xinwei Mu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Inhaled levosimendan versus intravenous levosimendan in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Tanveer Singh Kundra; P S Nagaraja; K S Bharathi; Parminder Kaur; N Manjunatha
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.