Literature DB >> 453199

Chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures.

D C Peakman, M F Moreton, B J Corn, A Robinson.   

Abstract

Over the past 6 years, using in situ processing methods, we have identified 32 cases of mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures prepared from 1,100 samples. Two of these (45,X/46,XX and 46,XX/47,XX, + 21) were called true mosaics because multiple colonies demonstrated the same abnormal chromosome complement, and on subsequent evaluation of the newborn blood or fetal tissues, mosaicism was confirmed. Of the remaining cases, 29 were designated as pseudomosaics because only single or partial colonies exhibited an aberrant chromosome complement, 12 having a trisomy 2 line. In the final case, a double trisomy was demonstrated in only one of eight colonies in the first culture, but in the culture from a repeat sample an additional two colonies showed the same double trisomy. Since no abnormal cells were observed in infant blood, it was postulated that the mosaicism may only have been present in the extraembryonic tissues. It is our conviction that the use of these cloning methods should diminish the danger of misdiagnosis in genetic amniocentesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 453199      PMCID: PMC1685752     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  28 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of 45,X/46,XY mosaicism with postnatal confirmation in a phenotypically normal male infant.

Authors:  L Y Hsu; H J Kim; R Hausknecht; K Hirschhorn
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Problems in prenatal diagnosis resulting from chromosomal mosaicism.

Authors:  N B Kardon; P R Chernay; L Y Hsu; J L Martin; K Hirschhorn
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.

Authors:  M Seabright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The antenatal diagnosis of genetic disease.

Authors:  T A Doran; N L Rudd; H A Gardner; J A Lowden; R J Benzie; S I Liedgren
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Errors of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis.

Authors:  K P Katayama; I J Park; R H Heller; B Y Barakat; E Preston; H W Jones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Sex chromosomal mosaicism undetected by prenatal study.

Authors:  R Ladda; R Hildebrandt; Y Dobelle
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures.

Authors:  N B Kardon; M Krauss; J G Davis; E C Jenkins
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Prenatal diagnosis: techniques used to help in ruling out maternal cell contamination.

Authors:  D C Peakman; M F Moreton; A Robinson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Selective endoreduplication or branched chromosome?

Authors:  B Noël; B Quack; J Mottet; Y Nantois; B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  Four cases of chromosome changes detected in course of prenatal diagnosis and probably originating in vitro.

Authors:  J Wahlström
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1978-04-24       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cytological, flow cytometric, and molecular analysis of the rapid evolution of mammalian chromosomes containing highly amplified DNA sequences.

Authors:  B Fendrock; M Destrempes; R J Kaufman; S A Latt
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1986

2.  Prenatal fetal karyotyping and maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening.

Authors:  C Gosden; K Buckton; Z Fotheringham; D J Brock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-01-24

3.  Efficacy and applicability of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  S Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Mosaic trisomies in human spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  T Hassold
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Comparison of chromosomal instability of human amniocytes in primary and long-term cultures in AmnioMAX II and DMEM media: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Seyed Mehdi Hoseini; Fateme Montazeri; Maryam Moghaddam-Matin; Ahmad Reza Bahrami; Hassan Heidarian Meimandi; Saeed Ghasemi-Esmailabad; Seyed Mehdi Kalantar
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-10-13

6.  T-lymphocytes with 7;14 translocations: frequency of occurrence, breakpoints, and clinical and biological significance.

Authors:  G W Dewald; K J Noonan; J L Spurbeck; D D Johnson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The application of an in situ karyotyping technique for mesenchymal stromal cells: a validation and comparison study with classical G-banding.

Authors:  Sang Mee Hwang; Cha-Ja See; Jungeun Choi; Seon Young Kim; Qute Choi; Jung Ah Kim; Jiseok Kwon; Si Nae Park; Kyongok Im; Il-Hoan Oh; Dong Soon Lee
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 8.718

8.  A prenatal missed diagnosed case of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities by karyotyping: the clinical utility of array-based CGH in prenatal diagnostics.

Authors:  Aihua Yin; Jian Lu; Chang Liu; Li Guo; Jing Wu; Mingqin Mai; Yanfang Zhong; Xiaozhuang Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 1 by combined Bionano optical mapping and karyomapping.

Authors:  Yuting Zheng; Lingrong Kong; Hui Xu; Yongjie Lu; Xuechao Zhao; Yuxia Yang; Guoliang Yu; Pidong Li; Fan Liang; Hongshuai Jin; Xiangdong Kong
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.050

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.