Literature DB >> 4530332

An analysis of the cost-of-selection concept.

R H Flake, V Grant.   

Abstract

It is shown for a continuous haploid model that the common standard assumptions used in calculating the cost of gene substitution, namely, large constant population size and small constant selective value, are unnecessary. Population size may fluctuate during the course of substitution without affecting the calculated total cost. The selective intensity does not need to be small and constant to give the standard result for substitution cost. Diploid models with multiple alleles are analyzed and contrasted with standard two-allele models in respect to calculation of substitution cost. The influence of population structure on the probability of occurrence of complete gene substitution is discussed on the basis of a numerical example. The robust nature of the cost-of-selection concept is examined in the light of a conservation principle.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4530332      PMCID: PMC433847          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.9.3716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Fertility excess necessary for gene substitution in regulated populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Population structure in relation to cost of selection.

Authors:  V Grant; R H Flake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Consciousness and biological order: toward a quantum theory of life and its evolution.

Authors:  A Goswami
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1997 Jan-Mar

2.  The cost of evolution and the imprecision of adaptation.

Authors:  P J Darlington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Solutions to the cost-of-selection dilemma.

Authors:  V Grant; R H Flake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Surprisingly Low Limits of Selection in Plant Domestication.

Authors:  Robin G Allaby; James L Kitchen; Dorian Q Fuller
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 1.625

5.  The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance.

Authors:  Alan Kleinman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.